PURPOSE: The lack of histopathological material has placed limitation on our knowledge on the composition of focal deposits in eyes with macular dystrophies, malattia leventinese, dominant drusen and age related macular degeneration. This study was designed to study the composition of focal deposits in these eyes by documenting fundus autofluorescence in vivo. METHODS: Fundus autofluorescence was documented in 343 eyes of 199 subjects with macular dystrophies, malattia leventinese, dominant drusen and age-related macular degeneration using a laser scanning ophthalmoscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen; excitation wavelength: 488 nm, barrier filter at 521 nm). RESULTS: Autofluorescence of focal deposits was increased in eyes with macular dystrophies. In eyes with malattia leventinese and dominant drusen autofluorescence intensity of focal deposits showed a wide spectrum. In contrast, autofluorescence of age-related drusen was within normal limits. Background autofluorescence intensity was increased in eyes with macular dystrophies and within normal limits in eyes with malattia leventinese, dominant drusen and age-related drusen. CONCLUSION: The technique of in-vivo recording of fundus autofluorescence allows the differential diagnosis between macular dystrophies/malattia leventinese, dominant drusen/age related drusen when otherwise not possible.
PURPOSE: The lack of histopathological material has placed limitation on our knowledge on the composition of focal deposits in eyes with macular dystrophies, malattia leventinese, dominant drusen and age related macular degeneration. This study was designed to study the composition of focal deposits in these eyes by documenting fundus autofluorescence in vivo. METHODS: Fundus autofluorescence was documented in 343 eyes of 199 subjects with macular dystrophies, malattia leventinese, dominant drusen and age-related macular degeneration using a laser scanning ophthalmoscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen; excitation wavelength: 488 nm, barrier filter at 521 nm). RESULTS: Autofluorescence of focal deposits was increased in eyes with macular dystrophies. In eyes with malattia leventinese and dominant drusen autofluorescence intensity of focal deposits showed a wide spectrum. In contrast, autofluorescence of age-related drusen was within normal limits. Background autofluorescence intensity was increased in eyes with macular dystrophies and within normal limits in eyes with malattia leventinese, dominant drusen and age-related drusen. CONCLUSION: The technique of in-vivo recording of fundus autofluorescence allows the differential diagnosis between macular dystrophies/malattia leventinese, dominant drusen/age related drusen when otherwise not possible.
Authors: Giuseppe Querques; Benjamin Guigui; Nicolas Leveziel; Lea Querques; Francesco Bandello; Eric H Souied Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2012-07-20 Impact factor: 3.117