Literature DB >> 9782035

Diagnosis and conservative management of intrathoracic leakage after oesophagectomy.

A Sauvanet1, J Baltar, J Le Mee, J Belghiti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intrathoracic leakage is a major complication of oesophagectomy, precise data concerning diagnostic features and results of conservative treatment are lacking.
METHODS: From 1986 to 1994, 409 oesophagectomies with stapled oesophagogastrostomy were performed, including 358 Lewis-Tanner and 51 Sweet procedures. A water-soluble contrast swallow was routinely performed on day 7 or later, before oral intake was begun. All patients except one received conservative non-surgical treatment, including nutritional support and perianastomotic drainage.
RESULTS: Leaks were diagnosed in 38 patients (9.3 per cent). The leakage rate was 7.8 per cent after the Lewis-Tanner procedure and 20 per cent after the Sweet procedure (P < 0.01). Eleven patients had no symptoms. Seven of the 27 patients with symptoms had a contrast swallow that was normal, and subsequently developed a confirmed fistula after the onset of oral intake. Five patients had to undergo reoperation. All asymptomatic patients and 18 symptomatic patients recovered. Nine patients died, mainly from multiple organ failure, including three who had reoperation for resection of the gastroplasty.
CONCLUSION: The potential presence of clinically silent fistula and the deleterious role of oral intake still justify routine detection of leakage after oesophageal resection. Conservative treatment results in survival with preservation of the gastroplasty in most patients, unless multiple organ failure occurs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9782035     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00869.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  25 in total

1.  Guidelines for the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer.

Authors:  W H Allum; S M Griffin; A Watson; D Colin-Jones
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Systemic inflammatory response syndrome as a predictor of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Satoshi Ono; Risa Takahata; Shuichi Hiraki; Yoshihisa Yaguchi; Isao Kumano; Yusuke Matsumoto; Kazumichi Yoshida; Satoshi Aiko; Takashi Ichikura; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Intrathoracic leaks following esophagectomy are no longer associated with increased mortality.

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Stephen G Swisher; Wayne Hofstetter; Arlene M Correa; Reza J Mehran; David C Rice; Ara A Vaporciyan; Garrett L Walsh; Jack A Roth
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  [Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage following esophageal and cardial resection : Definition and validation of a new severity grading classification].

Authors:  A Schaible; T Schmidt; M Diener; U Hinz; P Sauer; D Wichmann; A Königsrainer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Fluoroscopically guided nose tube drainage of mediastinal abscesses in post-operative gastro-oesophageal anastomotic leakage.

Authors:  Q Y Xu; G W Yin; S X Chen; F Jiang; X J Bai; J D Wu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 6.  [Management of postoperative complications following esophagectomy].

Authors:  D Schubert; St Dalicho; L Flohr; F Benedix; H Lippert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Assessment of the blood supply using the indocyanine green fluorescence method and postoperative endoscopic evaluation of anastomosis of the gastric tube during esophagectomy.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Tsutomu Namikawa; Jun Iwabu; Kazune Fujisawa; Sunao Uemura; Sachi Tsuda; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Significant decrease of mortality due to anastomotic leaks following esophageal resection: management makes the difference.

Authors:  Anja Schaible; Thorsten Brenner; Ulf Hinz; Thomas Schmidt; Markus Weigand; Peter Sauer; Markus W Büchler; Alexis Ulrich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Prognostic indicators of surgery for esophageal cancer: a 5 year experience.

Authors:  Nadim Khan; Adil Bangash; Muzaffaruddin Sadiq
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  Role of endoscopy to predict a leak after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Anja Schaible; Alexis Ulrich; Ulf Hinz; Markus W Büchler; Peter Sauer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.445

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.