Literature DB >> 9782024

Learning curve for oesophageal cancer surgery.

D N Sutton1, J Wayman, S M Griffin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical training and experience are frequently claimed to influence early and late outcome measures. The aim of this study was to examine any improvement in an individual surgeon's performance in one operation over a period of 7 years from initial appointment to date.
METHODS: Patients undergoing Ivor Lewis subtotal oesophagectomy performed by a single surgeon between April 1990 and December 1996 were identified from a prospectively compiled oesophageal cancer database. Operating time (abdominal, thoracic and 'one-lung time'), blood loss, transfusion requirements (intraoperative and total), extent of lymphadenectomy (number of lymph nodes sampled), intensive treatment unit (ITU) stay, hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality, pathological stage, grade and survival were recorded.
RESULTS: The records of 150 patients were identified for analysis. The cohort was split into five groups, each of 30 patients operated on consecutively. Each of the groups was comparable for age, sex, smoking history, preoperative haemoglobin and creatinine levels, weight loss, American Society of Anesthesiologists' grade, and histological stage and grade of disease. Analysis of the variables pertaining to operation revealed a significant improvement with time including reduced single-lung operating time (P=0.01), reduced blood loss (P=0.03), reduced transfusion requirement (P < 0.0001), reduced ITU stay (P< 0.0001), reduced inpatient stay (P< 0.0001) and an increased yield of lymph nodes (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: This study showed a continuing improvement in a surgeon's performance over a 7-year period. With the current trend to shorter training periods there is a case for continuing supervision of the 'fully trained' surgeon within highly specialist units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9782024     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00962.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  20 in total

1.  The surgeon as a prognostic factor.

Authors:  T Lerut
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Consensus statements for management of Barrett's dysplasia and early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, based on a Delphi process.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Nimish Vakil; Jacques Bergman; Rebecca Harrison; Robert Odze; Michael Vieth; Scott Sanders; Laura Gay; Oliver Pech; Gaius Longcroft-Wheaton; Yvonne Romero; John Inadomi; Jan Tack; Douglas A Corley; Hendrik Manner; Susi Green; David Al Dulaimi; Haythem Ali; Bill Allum; Mark Anderson; Howard Curtis; Gary Falk; M Brian Fennerty; Grant Fullarton; Kausilia Krishnadath; Stephen J Meltzer; David Armstrong; Robert Ganz; Gianpaolo Cengia; James J Going; John Goldblum; Charles Gordon; Heike Grabsch; Chris Haigh; Michio Hongo; David Johnston; Ricky Forbes-Young; Elaine Kay; Philip Kaye; Toni Lerut; Laurence B Lovat; Lars Lundell; Philip Mairs; Tadakuza Shimoda; Stuart Spechler; Stephen Sontag; Peter Malfertheiner; Iain Murray; Manoj Nanji; David Poller; Krish Ragunath; Jaroslaw Regula; Renzo Cestari; Neil Shepherd; Rajvinder Singh; Hubert J Stein; Nicholas J Talley; Jean-Paul Galmiche; Tony C K Tham; Peter Watson; Lisa Yerian; Massimo Rugge; Thomas W Rice; John Hart; Stuart Gittens; David Hewin; Juergen Hochberger; Peter Kahrilas; Sean Preston; Richard Sampliner; Prateek Sharma; Robert Stuart; Kenneth Wang; Irving Waxman; Chris Abley; Duncan Loft; Ian Penman; Nicholas J Shaheen; Amitabh Chak; Gareth Davies; Lorna Dunn; Yngve Falck-Ytter; John Decaestecker; Pradeep Bhandari; Christian Ell; S Michael Griffin; Stephen Attwood; Hugh Barr; John Allen; Mark K Ferguson; Paul Moayyedi; Janusz A Z Jankowski
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Learning curves in surgical practice.

Authors:  A N Hopper; M H Jamison; W G Lewis
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Surgeon proficiency and outcomes in esophagectomy: a perspective and comment on an analysis of the Swedish Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Fred Lee; Inderpal S Sarkaria; James D Luketich
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Learning how to do esophagectomies.

Authors:  Katy A Marino; Benny Weksler
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses.

Authors:  Leonie Haverkamp; Pieter C van der Sluis; Roy J J Verhage; Peter D Siersema; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  The Learning Curve in Surgical Practice and Its Applicability to Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Aditya Yeolekar; Haris Qadri
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-09-06

8.  One surgeon's learning curve for video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with the patient in lateral position: how many cases are needed to reach competence?

Authors:  Wei Guo; Ying-Bo Zou; Zheng Ma; Hui-Jun Niu; Yao-Guang Jiang; Yun-Ping Zhao; Tai-Qian Gong; Ru-Wen Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer during the induction period.

Authors:  Itasu Ninomiya; Harushi Osugi; Takashi Fujimura; Masato Kayahara; Hiroyuki Takamura; Masashi Takemura; Shigeru Lee; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Genichi Nishimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

10.  Workload and resource implications of upper gastrointestinal cancer surgical centralisation in South East Wales.

Authors:  M A Morgan; M Goodson; X Escofet; G W B Clark; W G Lewis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.