Literature DB >> 9782014

Prospective evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography to detect common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

S J Dwerryhouse1, E Brown, M N Vipond.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is frequently employed before operation to detect common bile duct stones. However, this is an invasive technique with recognized complications. This study evaluated the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) to detect choledocholithiasis in selected patients before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
METHODS: Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with risk factors for common bile duct stones, underwent MRC followed by ERC or peroperative cholangiography.
RESULTS: Over a 2-year period 40 patients were studied. MRC had a sensitivity of 88 per cent, specificity of 93 per cent, positive predictive value of 78 per cent and negative predictive value of 97 per cent for the detection of common bile duct stones.
CONCLUSION: MRC is a simple non-invasive method for preoperative screening for common bile duct stones in at-risk patients. In this study it would have reduced the need for ERC by three-quarters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9782014     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00957.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  17 in total

1.  Cost-effective management of common bile duct stones: a decision analysis of the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), intraoperative cholangiography, and laparoscopic bile duct exploration.

Authors:  D R Urbach; Y S Khajanchee; B A Jobe; B A Standage; P D Hansen; L L Swanstrom
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Magnetic resonance cholangiography in gallstone pancreatitis.

Authors:  Francisco José Morera
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Is routine MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) justified prior to cholecystectomy?

Authors:  C A Nebiker; S A Baierlein; S Beck; M von Flüe; C Ackermann; R Peterli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  The Value of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreatography (MRCP) in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Ankur Mandelia; Arun Kumar Gupta; Devendra Kumar Verma; Sanjeev Sharma
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 5.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Preoperative evaluation of the extrahepatic bile duct structure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  K Uchiyama; M Tani; M Kawai; M Ueno; T Hama; H Yamaue
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease.

Authors:  Humoud Al-Dhuhli
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2009-12-19

Review 8.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 9.  Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  E J M van Geenen; D L van der Peet; C J J Mulder; M A Cuesta; M J Bruno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Selective MRCP in the management of suspected common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Stuart Mercer; Sukhpal Singh; Iain Paterson
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.