Literature DB >> 9781481

A bootstrap approach to confidence regions for genetic parameters from Method R estimates.

A Reverter1, C J Kaiser, C H Mallinckrodt.   

Abstract

Confidence regions (CR) for heritability (h2) and fraction of variance accounted for by permanent environmental effects (c2) from Method R estimates were obtained from simulated data using a univariate, repeated measures, full animal model, with 50% subsampling. Bootstrapping techniques were explored to assess the optimum number of subsamples needed to compute Method R estimates of h2 and c2 with properties similar to those of exact estimators. One thousand estimates of each parameter set were used to obtain 90, 95, and 99% CR in four data sets including 2,500 animals with four measurements each. Two approaches were explored to assess CR accuracy: a parametric approach assuming bivariate normality of h2 and c2 and a nonparametric approach based on the sum of squared rank deviations. Accuracy of CR was assessed by the average loss of confidence (LOSS) by number of estimates sampled (NUMEST). For NUMEST = 5, bootstrap estimates of h2 and c2 were within 10(-3) of the asymptotic ones. The same degree of convergence in the estimates of SE was achieved with NUMEST = 20. Correlation between estimates of h2 and c2 ranged from -.83 to -.98. At NUMEST < 10, the nonparametric CR were more accurate than parametric CR. However, with the parametric CR, LOSS approached zero at rate NUMEST(-1). This rate was an order of magnitude larger for the nonparametric CR. These results suggested that when the computational burden of estimating genetic parameters limits the number of Method R estimates that can be obtained to, say, 10 or 20, reliable CR can still be obtained by processing Method R estimates through bootstrapping techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9781481     DOI: 10.2527/1998.7692263x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  3 in total

1.  Genetic variation and selection response in model breeding populations of Brassica rapa following a diversity bottleneck.

Authors:  William H Briggs; Irwin L Goldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Carcass conformation and fat cover scores in beef cattle: a comparison of threshold linear models vs grouped data models.

Authors:  Joaquim Tarrés; Marta Fina; Luis Varona; Jesús Piedrafita
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 4.297

3.  Different penalty methods for assessing interval from first to successful insemination in Japanese Black heifers

Authors:  Asep Setiaji; Takuro Oikawa
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.509

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.