Literature DB >> 9781405

Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting.

D T Gilbert1, E C Pinel, T D Wilson, S J Blumberg, T P Wheatley.   

Abstract

People are generally unaware of the operation of the system of cognitive mechanisms that ameliorate their experience of negative affect (the psychological immune system), and thus they tend to overestimate the duration of their affective reactions to negative events. This tendency was demonstrated in 6 studies in which participants overestimated the duration of their affective reactions to the dissolution of a romantic relationship, the failure to achieve tenure, an electoral defeat, negative personality feedback, an account of a child's death, and rejection by a prospective employer. Participants failed to distinguish between situations in which their psychological immune systems would and would not be likely to operate and mistakenly predicted overly and equally enduring affective reactions in both instances. The present experiments suggest that people neglect the psychological immune system when making affective forecasts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9781405     DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol        ISSN: 0022-3514


  78 in total

Review 1.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.

Authors:  Catherine J Norris; Jackie Gollan; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.251

Review 2.  Older and wiser? An affective science perspective on age-related challenges in financial decision making.

Authors:  Mariann R Weierich; Elizabeth A Kensinger; Alicia H Munnell; Steven A Sass; Brad C Dickerson; Christopher I Wright; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

4.  Factors Related to Linguistic Content in Video Narrative of Adolescents with Cancer and Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Lila Pereira; Jessica Sampson; Katie DiCola
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2019-10

5.  B-Sure: a randomized pilot trial of an interactive web-based decision support aid versus usual care in average-risk breast cancer patients considering contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.

Authors:  Sharon L Manne; Barbara L Smith; Sara Frederick; Anna Mitarotondo; Deborah A Kashy; Laurie J Kirstein
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Attitudes of Nurses Toward Disability and Treatment in Space-Occupying Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke.

Authors:  Hermann Neugebauer; Flora Malakou; Ingo Uttner; Melitta Köpke; Eric Jüttler
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.

Authors:  Rhonda N Balzarini; James N McDonald; Taylor Kohut; Justin J Lehmiller; Bjarne M Holmes; Jennifer J Harman
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 8.  Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.

Authors:  Jodi Halpern; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Emotion: The Self-regulatory Sense.

Authors:  Katherine T Peil
Journal:  Glob Adv Health Med       Date:  2014-03

10.  Women's concerns about the emotional impact of awareness of heritable breast cancer risk and its implications for their children.

Authors:  Suzanne C O'Neill; Darren Mays; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Judy E Garber; Tiffani A DeMarco; Beth N Peshkin; Katherine A Schneider; Kenneth P Tercyak
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2014-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.