Literature DB >> 9780564

In-vitro activity of piperacillin/tazobactam relative to other antibiotics against blood culture isolates.

M Cormican1, G Corbett-Feeney, S Kelly, D Hughes, J Flynn, R N Jones.   

Abstract

Resistance of bacteria to antibiotics is an increasing problem in many countries. Accurate locally relevant information is essential for detection and control of emerging resistance and to facilitate choice of empirical antibiotic therapy in the immediate management of seriously ill patients. We have determined the minimum inhibitory concentration of piperacillin/tazobactam for 97 strains of bacteria (55 Enterobacteriaceae, 13 non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli, 22 Staphylococcus aureus, 6 Enterococcus faecalis and 1 Bacillus cereus) isolated from blood cultures and compared its activity to that of amoxycillin, co-amoxiclav, cephalothin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, piperacillin, cefotaxime. The strains were consecutive non-fastidious isolates with the following qualifications: coagulase negative staphylococci and diphtheroids were excluded and the number of Staphylococcus aureus isolates was limited to 12 methicillin-resistant and 10 methicillin-sensitive strains. Multiple isolates of the same species from individual patients were not included. The minimum inhibition concentrations of methicillin, penicillin, teichoplanin and vancomycin were also determined for specific groups of organisms. MICs were determined by the Etest method (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) on Mueller Hinton agar. The MICs of appropriate American Type Culture Collection control strains were determined. Based on the interpretative criteria of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (USA), 87 per cent of Gram-negative bacilli were susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam compared with amoxycillin 26 per cent, cephalothin 35 per cent, co-amoxiclav 54 per cent, piperacillin 56 per cent, cefotaxime 69 per cent, ceftazidime 84 per cent, gentamicin 85 per cent and ciprofloxacin 91 per cent. Of all isolates 75 per cent were sensitive to piperacillin/tazobactam, compared with amoxycillin 22 per cent, cephalothin 35 per cent, piperacillin 41 per cent, co-amoxiclav 52 per cent, cefotaxime 59 per cent, ceftazidime 60 per cent, gentamicin 74 per cent and ciprofloxacin 77 per cent. Two isolates (1 E. coli and 1 Klebsiella pneumoniae) with antibiograms consistent with the relatively new resistance phenomenon of extended spectrum beta-lactamase production were identified. The spectrum of activity of piperacillin-tazobactam for empirical antibiotic therapy is significantly greater than that of piperacillin alone and is similar to that of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9780564     DOI: 10.1007/bf02937928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   1.568


  17 in total

Review 1.  Current perspectives on glycopeptide resistance.

Authors:  N Woodford; A P Johnson; D Morrison; D C Speller
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

Authors:  B E Murray
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  The prevalence of staphylococcal resistance to penicillinase-resistant penicillins. A retrospective and prospective national surveillance trial of isolates from 40 medical centers.

Authors:  R N Jones; A L Barry; R V Gardiner; R R Packer
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 4.  beta-Lactamases in laboratory and clinical resistance.

Authors:  D M Livermore
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Multicenter evaluation of the in vitro activity of piperacillin-tazobactam compared with eleven selected beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin against more than 42,000 aerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. In Vitro Susceptibility Surveillance Group.

Authors:  P R Murray; H F Cantrell; R B Lankford
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  A major outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus caused by a new phage-type (EMRSA-16)

Authors:  R A Cox; C Conquest; C Mallaghan; R R Marples
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Major trends in the microbial etiology of nosocomial infection.

Authors:  D R Schaberg; D H Culver; R P Gaynes
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1991-09-16       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Spread and maintenance of a dominant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone during an outbreak of MRSA disease in a Spanish hospital.

Authors:  M A Dominguez; H de Lencastre; J Linares; A Tomasz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Prevalence of antibiotic resistance among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  M F Tripodi; V Attanasio; L E Adinolfi; A Florio; P Cione; S Cuccurullo; R Utili; G Ruggiero
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 10.  Hospital-acquired infections: diseases with increasingly limited therapies.

Authors:  M N Swartz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.

Authors:  M Young; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.