Literature DB >> 9779534

Primary care research on low back pain. The state of the science.

D C Cherkin1.   

Abstract

The past few years have witnessed an explosion of primary care-relevant research on low back pain. The descriptive studies have helped elucidate the diagnostic and therapeutic interventions that are in current use. The literature syntheses have clarified what is known about the usefulness of these interventions. The randomized trials have pushed the frontiers of knowledge in several important areas. The quality of research in this field is mixed but has improved significantly in recent years. If research is to lead to substantial improvements in primary care for low back pain, however, the focus must be broadened to embrace an existing but neglected paradigm, the biopsychosocial model. It must be understood how the physician can become a more effective healer and counselor for the patient with back pain. This will require that greater attention be paid to literature outside of the field and that communication and collaboration with researchers in other disciplines increase. Modern distractions such as technology, litigation, and disability compensation have interfered with the ability of physicians to meet their patients' needs. If physicians are to become more effective managers of such common problems as low back pain, they must rediscover their ability to help their patients cope with illness and suffering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9779534     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199809150-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

1.  Psychological distress and somatisation as prognostic factors in patients with musculoskeletal illness in general practice.

Authors:  C K Jørgensen; P Fink; F Olesen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Managing injured workers: family physicians' experiences.

Authors:  Grant Russell; Judith Belle Brown; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Comparison of a biopsychosocial therapy (BT) with a conventional biomedical therapy (MT) of subacute low back pain in the first episode of sick leave: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Marcus Schiltenwolf; Matthias Buchner; Bernhard Heindl; Johannes von Reumont; Annette Müller; Wolfgang Eich
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-26       Impact factor: 3.134

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.