Literature DB >> 9779140

Clinical evaluation of the Codman microsensor intracranial pressure monitoring system.

H M Fernandes1, K Bingham, I R Chambers, A D Mendelow.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of the Camino fibre-optic subdural device for measuring Intracranial Pressure (ICP) in patients, has been shown to correlate well with recordings from the "gold standard" intraventricular fluid filled catheter [1]. Following this work, its use has become standard in the clinical monitoring of patients. More recently, laboratory studies have demonstrated accuracy, acceptable drift and high fidelity for the new Codman Microsensor ICP Transducer, a miniature strain gauge mounted on a flexible nylon catheter [3]. Its performance in patients, however, has yet to be fully assessed, in comparative studies.
METHODS: Eight patients (5 head injured, 3 with an Intracerebral haematoma) had a Codman Microsensor inserted. A Camino Transducer was fitted immediately adjacent to it. A computerised system was used to continuously record both ICP readings.
RESULTS: In total 140,323 recordings were made over a wide range of ICP values. Study periods ranged from 0.5 to 116 hours. In one patient the Codman transducer tracing failed after several days, probably due to fracture of electrical cable close to the interface box. The readings from the two ICP transducers were compared on Time Series, logistic regression and Altman-Bland plots. Drift of the ICP recorded by the Codman microsensor, was noted in 2 patients, 1 in positive direction (maximum 30 mmHg), 1 negative (max. 20 mmHg). In both cases the Camino ICP recording was relatively stable. In 24% of the recordings the Codman microsensor recorded ICP as 5 or more mmHg greater than the Camino, this difference was 10 mmHg or greater in 9% of recordings. Conversely the Camino recording was 5 mmHg or more, than the Codman, in 5% of all recordings, and 10 mmHg or more in 3%.
CONCLUSION: These differences could in the majority of cases (excepting the negative drift) be explained by a constant offset of the Codman transducer, as described previously [6]. Further examination of this device is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9779140     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl        ISSN: 0065-1419


  12 in total

1.  An evaluation and comparison of intraventricular, intraparenchymal, and fluid-coupled techniques for intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  John Vender; Jennifer Waller; Krishnan Dhandapani; Dennis McDonnell
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Neurological management of fulminant hepatic failure.

Authors:  Jennifer A Frontera; Thomas Kalb
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Neurological complications of solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Amy A Pruitt; Francesc Graus; Myrna R Rosenfeld
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2013-07

4.  The baseline pressure of intracranial pressure (ICP) sensors can be altered by electrostatic discharges.

Authors:  Per K Eide; André Bakken
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 5.  Advances in Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Its Significance in Managing Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Usmah Kawoos; Richard M McCarron; Charles R Auker; Mikulas Chavko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2015-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Review: pathophysiology of intracranial hypertension and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Nicolas Canac; Kian Jalaleddini; Samuel G Thorpe; Corey M Thibeault; Robert B Hamilton
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2020-06-23

7.  An intracranial pressure-derived index monitored simultaneously from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Simultaneous monitoring of static and dynamic intracranial pressure parameters from two separate sensors in patients with cerebral bleeds: comparison of findings.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Sverre Holm; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Baseline pressure errors (BPEs) extensively influence intracranial pressure scores: results of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Per Kristian Eide; Angelika Sorteberg; Torstein R Meling; Wilhelm Sorteberg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  Early Experience of Automated Intraventricular Type Intracranial Pressure Monitoring (LiquoGuard®) for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Authors:  Young Sub Kwon; Yun Ho Lee; Jin Mo Cho
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2016-04-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.