Literature DB >> 9778820

Factors affecting the retention of dust mite allergen on carpet.

R D Lewis1, P N Breysse, P S Lees, M Diener-West, R G Hamilton, P Eggleston.   

Abstract

Carpeting is one of the most common and perhaps the most important reservoir of aeroallergens and other components of dust found in residential or commercial settings. This research evaluated factors that affect the retention of dust mite allergens on different types of tufted carpet commonly found in homes and offices. Twenty-six types of carpet were custom manufactured as part of a two-stage factorial experiment using 182 carpet samples. Carpets differed with respect to fiber denier, cross-sectional shape, presence of fluorocarbon treatment, carpet style, pile height, and pile density. The major hypothesis tested was that the amount of allergen-containing dust recovered from vacuum samples of tufted carpet sources was dependent on micro (fiber) or macro (construction) retention characteristics of the carpets. Carpet samples were doped in a uniform and reproducible manner using an allergen-containing reference dust. A standardized vacuum surface sampler was used to recover dust from samples. Allergen was assayed using a standard, monoclonal antibody ELISA. Carpet-surface area and presence of fluorocarbon were found to have the largest effects on retention and recovery of dust and allergen. Specifically, fluorocarbon treatment of fibers, square-hollow fiber shape, high-denier fiber, low-pile height in cut-pile carpets, and low-pile density in loop carpets were significantly associated with increased release and recovery of allergen. Results from this study suggest that carpet type be considered for both allergen avoidance and allergy and asthma risk assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9778820     DOI: 10.1080/15428119891010776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  6 in total

1.  Environmental assessment and exposure control of dust mites: a practice parameter.

Authors:  Jay Portnoy; Jeffrey D Miller; P Brock Williams; Ginger L Chew; J David Miller; Fares Zaitoun; Wanda Phipatanakul; Kevin Kennedy; Charles Barnes; Carl Grimes; Désirée Larenas-Linnemann; James Sublett; David Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; David Khan; David Lang; Richard Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Christopher Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon Spector; Stephen A Tilles; Dana Wallace
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 2.  A new model for environmental assessment and exposure reduction.

Authors:  Christina E Ciaccio; Kevin Kennedy; Jay M Portnoy
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Environmental assessment and exposure reduction of rodents: a practice parameter.

Authors:  Wanda Phipatanakul; Elizabeth Matsui; Jay Portnoy; P Brock Williams; Charles Barnes; Kevin Kennedy; David Bernstein; Joann Blessing-Moore; Linda Cox; David Khan; David Lang; Richard Nicklas; John Oppenheimer; Christopher Randolph; Diane Schuller; Sheldon Spector; Stephen A Tilles; Dana Wallace; James Sublett; Jonathan Bernstein; Carl Grimes; J David Miller; James Seltzer
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.347

Review 4.  Assessment of indoor allergen exposure.

Authors:  Robert G Hamilton
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.919

Review 5.  Allergen avoidance.

Authors:  E Tovey
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 6.  Role of house-dust endotoxin exposure in aetiology of allergy and asthma.

Authors:  O Michel
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.711

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.