Literature DB >> 9777815

Center-specific graft and patient survival rates: 1997 United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) report.

H M Lin1, H M Kauffman, M A McBride, D B Davies, J D Rosendale, C M Smith, E B Edwards, O P Daily, J Kirklin, C F Shield, L G Hunsicker.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Multiple comprehensive, risk-adjusted studies evaluating short-term surgical mortality have been reported previously. This report analyzes short-term and long-term outcomes, both nationally and at each individual transplant program, for all solid organ transplantations performed in the United States.
OBJECTIVES: To report graft and patient survival rates for all solid organ transplantations, both nationally and at each specific transplant program in the United States, and to compare the expected survival rate with the actual survival rate of each individual program. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Multivariate regression analysis of donor and recipient factors affecting graft and patient survival of all kidney, liver, pancreas, heart, lung, and heart-lung transplants reported to the United Network for Organ Sharing from 742 separate transplant programs. PATIENTS: A cohort of 97587 solid organ transplantations performed on 92966 recipients in the United States from January 1988 through April 1994. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Short-term and conditional 3-year national and individual transplant program graft and patient survival rates overall and from 2 separate eras (era 1, January 1988-April 1992; era 2, May 1992-April 1994); comparison of actual center-specific performance with risk-adjusted expected performance and identification of centers with better-than-expected or worse-than-expected survival rates.
RESULTS: One-year graft follow-up exceeded 98% and conditional 3-year follow-up exceeded 91% for all organs. Graft and patient survival improved significantly in era 2 compared with era 1 for all cadaver organs except heart, which remained the same. One-year cadaveric graft survival ranged from 81.5% for heart to 61.9% for heart-lung and 3-year conditional graft survival ranged from 91.3% for pancreas to 74.7% for lung. The percentage of programs whose actual 1-year graft survival was not different from or was better than their risk-adjusted expected survival ranged from 98.3% for heart-lung to 75.7% for liver. Most kidney, liver, and heart programs whose actual survival was significantly less than expected performed small numbers (less than the national average) of transplantations per year.
CONCLUSIONS: Graft and patient survival for solid organ transplantations showed improvement over time. Conditional 3-year graft and patient survival rates were approximately 90% for all organs except for lung and heart-lung. The conditional 3-year survival rates were better than 1-year survival rates, indicating the major risk after transplantation occurs in the first year. The majority of transplant programs achieved actual survival rates not significantly different from their expected survival rates. Center effects were most significant within the first year after transplantation and had much less influence on long-term survival outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; United Network for Organ Sharing

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9777815     DOI: 10.1001/jama.280.13.1153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  13 in total

1.  Influence of reporting methods of outcomes across transplant centers.

Authors:  Akinlolu O Ojo
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Relationship between provider volume and outcomes for orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  John E Scarborough; Ricardo Pietrobon; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Bradley H Collins; Dev M Desai; Paul C Kuo; Theodore N Pappas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Inhaled cyclosporine and pulmonary function in lung transplant recipients.

Authors:  Soleyah Groves; Marek Galazka; Bruce Johnson; Timothy Corcoran; Avelino Verceles; Edward Britt; Nevins Todd; Bartley Griffith; Gerald C Smaldone; Aldo Iacono
Journal:  J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.849

4.  Temporal trends in liver transplant centre volume in the USA.

Authors:  Elisabeth T Tracy; Kyla M Bennett; Emeline M Aviki; Theodore N Pappas; Bradley H Collins; Janet E Tuttle-Newhall; Carlos E Marroquin; Paul C Kuo; John E Scarborough
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Impact of a learning curve model in kidney transplantation on functional outcome and surgical complications in a small volume centre: does size really matter?

Authors:  Guido Fechner; Ilja Seifert; Stefan Hauser; Stefan C Müller
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Expanding transplant outcomes research opportunities through the use of a common data model.

Authors:  Sylvia Cho; Sumit Mohan; Syed Ali Husain; Karthik Natarajan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 8.086

7.  "Nature versus nurture" study of deceased-donor pairs in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Daniel W Louvar; Na Li; Jon Snyder; Yi Peng; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 10.121

8.  The Effect of Augmenting OPTN Data With External Death Data on Calculating Patient Survival Rates After Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  Amber R Wilk; Leah B Edwards; Erick B Edwards
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Fused Lasso Approach in Regression Coefficients Clustering - Learning Parameter Heterogeneity in Data Integration.

Authors:  Lu Tang; Peter X K Song
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.654

10.  Expression of calcineurin activity after lung transplantation: a 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Sylvia Sanquer; Catherine Amrein; Dominique Grenet; Romain Guillemain; Bruno Philippe; Veronique Boussaud; Laurence Herry; Celine Lena; Alphonsine Diouf; Michelle Paunet; Eliane M Billaud; Françoise Loriaux; Jean-Philippe Jais; Robert Barouki; Marc Stern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.