Literature DB >> 9777498

Seven years clinical experience with mandibular distraction in children.

F R Carls1, H F Sailer.   

Abstract

Mandibular distraction was performed on 14 children, between September 1991 and December 1997. Their average age was 6.9 years, ranging from 1.5 to 13.5 years. All patients had severe hypoplastic mandibles with retromandibulism. Seven of the children (50%) had respiratory distress due to obstruction of the upper airway before distraction. This resolved in every case. Five patients underwent unilateral and nine bilateral distraction. A total of 23 distractors were used, 15 were applied extraorally and 8 endorally. The average latency time after operation was 2.8 days, but for the past 2 years, distraction was started beginning with the operation. The distraction was increased twice daily for an average of 5.5 weeks, by 0.4 or 0.5 mm each time, depending on the distractor. Computed tomography and ultrasound were used to follow the ossification process in the distraction gap and to measure the lengthening achieved. Subsequent retention time averaged 2.4 weeks. The mandibles were elongated by up to 18 mm (average 9.3 mm) and the respiratory distress symptoms resolved in all patients. Several minor complications which are reported occurred. Six patients were followed up for periods between 3 and 7 years. During this time further growth of the distracted mandibles was recorded.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9777498     DOI: 10.1016/s1010-5182(98)80015-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  8 in total

1.  Three-dimensional evaluation of mandibular bone regenerated by bone transport distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Elias Kontogiorgos; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Uriel Zapata; Ibrahim Zakhary; William W Nagy; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Regenerate healing outcomes in unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis using quantitative histomorphometry.

Authors:  Daniel A Schwarz; Krikor G Arman; Mehreen S Kakwan; Ameen M Jamali; Ayman A Elmeligy; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  A systematic review on the outcome of distraction osteogenesis in TMJ ankylosis.

Authors:  Ankita Chugh; Divya Mehrotra; Pradeep K Yadav
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-07-16

4.  Role of ultrasound in the active management of osteogenesis during compression-distraction osteosynthesis in children().

Authors:  A Nadtochiy
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2008-02-11

Review 5.  Distraction osteogenesis as a treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A systematic review.

Authors:  Wai Kin Tsui; Yanqi Yang; Lim Kwong Cheung; Yiu Yan Leung
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Two-Axis Continuous Distractor for Mandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  Shahrokh Hatefi; Milad Etemadi Sh; Javad Alizargar; Venous Behdadipour; Khaled Abou-El-Hossein
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-06

7.  The long-term effects of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on developing deciduous molar teeth.

Authors:  Paul Hong; Elise Graham; James Belyea; S Mark Taylor; Donald B Kearns; Michael Bezuhly
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2012-10-17

8.  Three-dimensional functional unit analysis of hemifacial microsomia mandible-a preliminary report.

Authors:  Ji Wook Choi; Byung Hoon Kim; Hyung Soo Kim; Tae Hoon Yu; Bong Chul Kim; Sang-Hwy Lee
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2015-09-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.