INTRODUCTION: Phototoxicity of intra-tumoral injected methylene blue (MB+) was studied in 48 experimental colonic tumours in comparison with photosan-3, Zn-phthalocyanine and tetrasulphanated ClAl-phthalocyanine. METHODS: In mice. xenotransplanted subcutaneous tumours about 1 cm in diameter were treated photodynamically twice, with different sensitisers. The irradiation was performed at the sensitiser-specific wavelength, and a density of 100 mW/cm2 and a dose of 100 J/cm2. RESULTS: Light alone without sensitiser did not induce any effect in mice tumours. Surprisingly, Al-phthalocyanine could only be used for intratumoral injections because of toxic effects after intravenous applications in nude mice. Using MB+ (1%), 75% of the tumours were destroyed by a single photodynamic treatment (PDT). In addition, toxicity of MB+ was most intense when compared with Zn-phthalocyanine and photosan-3. However, after the second PDT, there was no statistically significant difference among these sensitisers. Dark toxicity of MB+ (1%) could be well demonstrated by sufficient sensitiser incorporation without irradiation, which led to a stationary tumour volume up to 3 weeks after injection. CONCLUSION: Intra-tumoral MB+ PDT is a potential treatment for inducing necrosis in vivo. With regard to tumour tissue, the selectivity of MB+ is high and depends on a precise local injection of the dye.
INTRODUCTION: Phototoxicity of intra-tumoral injected methylene blue (MB+) was studied in 48 experimental colonic tumours in comparison with photosan-3, Zn-phthalocyanine and tetrasulphanated ClAl-phthalocyanine. METHODS: In mice. xenotransplanted subcutaneous tumours about 1 cm in diameter were treated photodynamically twice, with different sensitisers. The irradiation was performed at the sensitiser-specific wavelength, and a density of 100 mW/cm2 and a dose of 100 J/cm2. RESULTS: Light alone without sensitiser did not induce any effect in micetumours. Surprisingly, Al-phthalocyanine could only be used for intratumoral injections because of toxic effects after intravenous applications in nude mice. Using MB+ (1%), 75% of the tumours were destroyed by a single photodynamic treatment (PDT). In addition, toxicity of MB+ was most intense when compared with Zn-phthalocyanine and photosan-3. However, after the second PDT, there was no statistically significant difference among these sensitisers. Dark toxicity of MB+ (1%) could be well demonstrated by sufficient sensitiser incorporation without irradiation, which led to a stationary tumour volume up to 3 weeks after injection. CONCLUSION:Intra-tumoralMB+ PDT is a potential treatment for inducing necrosis in vivo. With regard to tumour tissue, the selectivity of MB+ is high and depends on a precise local injection of the dye.