Literature DB >> 9776206

Accuracy of self-reported hearing loss.

D M Nondahl1, K J Cruickshanks, T L Wiley, T S Tweed, R Klein, B E Klein.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy, in older adults, of questions assessing hearing loss. Study participants (n=3,556), aged 48-92 years, were examined in a population-based study of age-related hearing loss in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. Self-report data from the ten-question Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly-screening Version (HHIE-S), and four additional questions were compared with hearing loss as measured by pure-tone air conduction audiometry. The single question, 'Do you feel you have a hearing loss?' was the most sensitive question (sensitivity=71 per cent); its overall and gender-specific prevalence estimates were within 3.2 per cent of prevalence measures derived audiometrically, although age-group specific estimates were not as accurate. Using an HHIE-S total score >8 resulted in low sensitivity (34 per cent) and inaccurate prevalence estimates. These results indicate that, for some applications, one simple question may be sufficient for prevalence surveys of hearing loss among older adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9776206     DOI: 10.3109/00206099809072983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  74 in total

1.  Mass transit ridership and self-reported hearing health in an urban population.

Authors:  Robyn R M Gershon; Martin F Sherman; Lori A Magda; Halley E Riley; Tara P McAlexander; Richard Neitzel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.671

2.  Injury Risk and Noise Exposure in Firefighter Training Operations.

Authors:  Richard L Neitzel; Rachel N Long; Kan Sun; Stephanie Sayler; Terry L von Thaden
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2015-12-27

3.  Biomarkers of Systemic Inflammation and Risk of Incident Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Shruti Gupta; Sharon G Curhan; Gary C Curhan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Factors associated with the accuracy of subjective assessments of hearing impairment.

Authors:  Rebecca J Kamil; Dane J Genther; Frank R Lin
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 5.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

Review 6.  Impact of nonaspirin nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and acetaminophen on sensorineural hearing loss: a systematic review.

Authors:  Meghann E Kyle; James C Wang; Jennifer J Shin
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 3.497

7.  Empirical redefinition of comprehensive health and well-being in the older adults of the United States.

Authors:  Martha K McClintock; William Dale; Edward O Laumann; Linda Waite
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Self-Reported Hearing in the Last 2 Years of Life in Older Adults.

Authors:  Alexander K Smith; Christine S Ritchie; Yinghui Miao; W John Boscardin; Margaret L Wallhagen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Prevalence of hearing loss in Black and White elders: results of the Cardiovascular Health Study.

Authors:  Sheila R Pratt; Lewis Kuller; Evelyn O Talbott; Kathleen McHugh-Pemu; Alhaji M Buhari; Xiaohui Xu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Topical intranasal corticosteroids in 4-11 year old children with persistent bilateral otitis media with effusion in primary care: double blind randomised placebo controlled trial.

Authors:  Ian Williamson; Sarah Benge; Sheila Barton; Stavros Petrou; Louise Letley; Nicky Fasey; Mark Haggard; Paul Little
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-12-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.