Literature DB >> 9776159

A new evaluation of pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy using secretin magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

M Sho1, Y Nakajima, H Kanehiro, M Hisanaga, K Nishio, M Nagao, Y Tatekawa, N Ikeda, H Kanokogi, T Yamada, S Hirohashi, R Hirohashi, H Uchida, H Nakano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The remnant pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy influences greatly postoperative quality of life. However, it has been difficult to evaluate the exocrine remnant pancreatic function postoperatively. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of secretin-stimulated magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (secretin MRCP) in evaluating the remnant pancreatic function and ascertaining the anastomotic patency after pancreatoduodenectomy.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were evaluated with secretin MRCP. The results of MRCP were determined by the amount of exocrine pancreatic secretion, and were graded as follows: grade I (poor secretion), grade II (moderate secretion), and grade III (good secretion).
RESULTS: Secretin MRCP could visualize the pancreatic secretion dynamically. MRCP grades were grade I in 11 patients, grade II in 12, and grade III in 11. There was a significant correlation between MRCP grade and glucose tolerance. We confirmed visually the patency of the anastomotic site in 24 patients (71%). MRCP grades correlated significantly with clinical symptoms.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated secretin MRCP was feasible for evaluating the remnant pancreatic function after pancreatoduodenectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9776159     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00148-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  5 in total

1.  Revision of anastomotic stenosis after pancreatic head resection for chronic pancreatitis: is it futile?

Authors:  Katherine A Morgan; Bennett B Fontenot; Norman R Harvey; David B Adams
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  The inconsistent nature of symptomatic pancreatico-jejunostomy anastomotic strictures.

Authors:  Aram N Demirjian; Tara S Kent; Mark P Callery; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Is Revision Surgery Justified for Symptomatic Pancreatico-enteric Anastomotic Stenosis in Long-term Survivors Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Malignancy?

Authors:  Prasad Wagle; Kamal Sunder Yadav; Priyanka Akhilesh Sali; Raman Garg; Paresh Varty
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Surgical revision for pancreatojejunostomy stricture: a case series of 14 patients.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Shimeng Huang; Tewodross Getu Wolde; Zipeng Lu; Jianmin Chen; Junli Wu; Wentao Gao; Kuirong Jiang; Yi Miao; Jishu Wei
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.030

Review 5.  Secretin-stimulated MR cholangiopancreatography: spectrum of findings in pancreatic diseases.

Authors:  Piero Boraschi; Francescamaria Donati; Rosa Cervelli; Federica Pacciardi
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2016-09-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.