Literature DB >> 9775517

Motor processes in mental rotation.

M Wexler1, S M Kosslyn, A Berthoz.   

Abstract

Much indirect evidence supports the hypothesis that transformations of mental images are at least in part guided by motor processes, even in the case of images of abstract objects rather than of body parts. For example, rotation may be guided by processes that also prime one to see results of a specific motor action. We directly test the hypothesis by means of a dual-task paradigm in which subjects perform the Cooper-Shepard mental rotation task while executing an unseen motor rotation in a given direction and at a previously-learned speed. Four results support the inference that mental rotation relies on motor processes. First, motor rotation that is compatible with mental rotation results in faster times and fewer errors in the imagery task than when the two rotations are incompatible. Second, the angle through which subjects rotate their mental images, and the angle through which they rotate a joystick handle are correlated, but only if the directions of the two rotations are compatible. Third, motor rotation modifies the classical inverted V-shaped mental rotation response time function, favoring the direction of the motor rotation; indeed, in some cases motor rotation even shifts the location of the minimum of this curve in the direction of the motor rotation. Fourth, the preceding effect is sensitive not only to the direction of the motor rotation, but also to the motor speed. A change in the speed of motor rotation can correspondingly slow down or speed up the mental rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9775517     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00032-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  56 in total

Review 1.  If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question?

Authors:  S M Kosslyn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  An fMRI study of imagined self-rotation.

Authors:  S H Creem; T H Downs; M Wraga; G S Harrington; D R Proffitt; J H Downs
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 3.  Stimulus and response representations underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects.

Authors:  Yang Seok Cho; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

4.  When meaning matters, look but don't touch: the effects of posture on reading.

Authors:  Christopher C Davoli; Feng Du; Juan Montana; Susan Garverick; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

5.  Sensorimotor memory of weight asymmetry in object manipulation.

Authors:  Lulu L C D Bursztyn; J Randall Flanagan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation.

Authors:  Jessica K Witt; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The timing of temporoparietal and frontal activations during mental own body transformations from different visuospatial perspectives.

Authors:  Lars Schwabe; Bigna Lenggenhager; Olaf Blanke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action.

Authors:  Autumn B Hostetter; Martha W Alibali
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-06

9.  Individual differences in mental rotation: what does gesture tell us?

Authors:  Tilbe Göksun; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Nora Newcombe; Thomas Shipley
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-02-20

10.  Spatial transformations of bodies and objects in adults with autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Amy Pearson; Lauren Marsh; Antonia Hamilton; Danielle Ropar
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2014-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.