PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a 10/0 monofilament absorbable polyglactin suture for temporal 5.2 mm corneal incision phacoemulsification. METHODS: A prospective randomised controlled study of 49 patients undergoingphacoemulsification with a sutured temporal 5.2 mm corneal section was conducted to compare the refractive results and complications of a 10/0 monofilament absorbable polyglactin suture with 10/0 nylon. RESULTS:Thirty-eight patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in induced astigmatism between the two groups. All absorbable sutures were intact at 1 week. Six weeks post-operatively the absorbable suture was still intact in 1 (6%) patient, present but broken in 4 (24%) and completely absent in 12 (70%) patients. All polyglactin sutures had been completely absorbed by 12 weeks. Absorption of the polyglactin sutures was associated with mild localised corneal haze in 3(18%) cases (p = 0.055). One of the 18 patients (6%) in the polyglactin suture group presented with iris prolapse associated with knot failure 1 week post-operatively. There was no significant difference in foreign body symptoms between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:10/0 polyglactin sutures maintain adequate tensile strength during the immediate post-operative period for small incision surgery and are associated with minimal induction of astigmatism. Their subsequent absorption obviates the need for routine suture removal. Suture absorption is well tolerated although in some cases a mild degree of local tissue reaction raises concern about possible mechanisms of absorption. The risk of knot failure may be reduced by an alternative suture tying technique. 10/0 monofilament polyglactin is an attractive option when a suture is required during small incision cataract surgery.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of a 10/0 monofilament absorbable polyglactin suture for temporal 5.2 mm corneal incision phacoemulsification. METHODS: A prospective randomised controlled study of 49 patients undergoing phacoemulsification with a sutured temporal 5.2 mm corneal section was conducted to compare the refractive results and complications of a 10/0 monofilament absorbable polyglactin suture with 10/0 nylon. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients completed the study. There was no significant difference in induced astigmatism between the two groups. All absorbable sutures were intact at 1 week. Six weeks post-operatively the absorbable suture was still intact in 1 (6%) patient, present but broken in 4 (24%) and completely absent in 12 (70%) patients. All polyglactin sutures had been completely absorbed by 12 weeks. Absorption of the polyglactin sutures was associated with mild localised corneal haze in 3(18%) cases (p = 0.055). One of the 18 patients (6%) in the polyglactin suture group presented with iris prolapse associated with knot failure 1 week post-operatively. There was no significant difference in foreign body symptoms between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: 10/0 polyglactin sutures maintain adequate tensile strength during the immediate post-operative period for small incision surgery and are associated with minimal induction of astigmatism. Their subsequent absorption obviates the need for routine suture removal. Suture absorption is well tolerated although in some cases a mild degree of local tissue reaction raises concern about possible mechanisms of absorption. The risk of knot failure may be reduced by an alternative suture tying technique. 10/0 monofilament polyglactin is an attractive option when a suture is required during small incision cataract surgery.