Literature DB >> 9774724

Somatosensory automatic responses to deviant stimuli.

N Shinozaki1, H Yabe, T Sutoh, T Hiruma, S Kaneko.   

Abstract

We studied event-related potentials (ERPs) produced in response to deviant stimuli in a sequence of somatosensory stimuli which were measured under stimulus-ignoring conditions. A change in the repetitive somatosensory input elicited not only a frontal negativity which was similar to the somatosensory mismatch negativity very recently reported by Kekoni et al. [J. Kekoni, H. Hämäläinen, M. Saarinen, J. Gröhn, K. Reinikainen, A. Lehtokoski, R. Näätänen, Rate effect and mismatch responses in the somatosensory system: ERP-recordings in humans, Biol. Psychol. 46 (1997) 125-142] but also a positive deflection ranging in latency from 100 to 200 ms. This somatosensory change-related positivity was reduced with prolongation of the interstimulus interval (ISI) and was different from the responses to the deviant stimuli when they were presented alone. These findings suggest that the somatosensory change-related positivity is probably generated not by activation of new afferent elements but by a detection of change in a process of comparison with sensory memory. Copyright 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9774724     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(98)00020-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  24 in total

1.  Reflection of an orienting reflex in the phases of evoked potentials in the rabbit visual cortex and hippocampus during substitution of stimulus intensity.

Authors:  V B Polyanskii; D V Evtikhin; E N Sokolov
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2004-01

2.  Active attention modulates passive attention-related neural responses to sudden somatosensory input against a silent background.

Authors:  Tetsuo Kida; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Limited plasticity of difference neurons in the visual cortex and hippocampus in rabbits during the oddball (random substitutions) test.

Authors:  V B Polyanskii; D V Evtikhin; E N Sokolov; A V Kryuchkova
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-06

4.  Effects of stimulus frequency and duration on somatosensory discrimination responses.

Authors:  L A Spackman; S G Boyd; A Towell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effect of stimulus probability on the somatosensory mismatch field.

Authors:  Kosuke Akatsuka; Toshiaki Wasaka; Hiroki Nakata; Tetsuo Kida; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Bi-directional modulation of somatosensory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation: an event related potential study.

Authors:  Jui-Cheng Chen; Dorothea Hämmerer; Kevin D'Ostilio; Elias P Casula; Louise Marshall; Chon-Haw Tsai; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Somatosensory off-response in humans: an ERP study.

Authors:  Koya Yamashiro; Koji Inui; Naofumi Otsuru; Tetsuo Kida; Kosuke Akatsuka; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neural surprise in somatosensory Bayesian learning.

Authors:  Sam Gijsen; Miro Grundei; Robert T Lange; Dirk Ostwald; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Common or redundant neural circuits for duration processing across audition and touch.

Authors:  John S Butler; Sophie Molholm; Ian C Fiebelkorn; Manuel R Mercier; Theodore H Schwartz; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 10.  Cerebellar information processing and visuospatial functions.

Authors:  Marco Molinari; Maria G Leggio
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.648

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.