Literature DB >> 9774508

Variations in molar enamel thickness among primates.

R P Shellis1, A D Beynon, D J Reid, K M Hiiemae.   

Abstract

Because of its hardness, resistance to abrasion and its influence on crown morphology, molar enamel thickness is an important factor in adaptation of the dentition to the diet. Enamel thickness has also been discussed extensively in relation to the phylogenetic relationships among the hominoids. The aims of this study were: (1) to analyse enamel thickness/tooth size relationships among primates as a whole, and (2) to evaluate variations in enamel thickness among hominoids against the background of the other primates. We employed measures of tooth size, and of enamel thickness and quantity based on measurements of areas in longitudinal sections of 125 molars of 39 species. Among primates, there were two grades of enamel thickness, prosimians having thinner enamel for a given tooth size or body weight than anthropoids. The scaling of enamel thickness with tooth size and body weight tended to show positive allometry among anthropoids. Comparison of hominoid enamel thicknesses with that in anthropoids led to the conclusion that Hylobates has enamel of average thickness, Homo has thick enamel and Gorilla has thin enamel, while Pan and Pongo had average or thin enamel, depending on tooth type. These results may be relevant to considerations of hominoid evolution. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9774508     DOI: 10.1006/jhev.1998.0238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  15 in total

1.  Enamel thickness in the Middle Miocene great apes Anoiapithecus, Pierolapithecus and Dryopithecus.

Authors:  D M Alba; J Fortuny; S Moyà-Solà
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Progress in understanding hominoid dental development.

Authors:  C Dean
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Jaw-muscle fiber architecture in tufted capuchins favors generating relatively large muscle forces without compromising jaw gape.

Authors:  Andrea B Taylor; Christopher J Vinyard
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 4.  Integrating the genotype and phenotype in hominid paleontology.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dietary change and adaptive evolution of enamelin in humans and among primates.

Authors:  Joanna L Kelley; Willie J Swanson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Hard-object feeding in sooty mangabeys (Cercocebus atys) and interpretation of early hominin feeding ecology.

Authors:  David J Daegling; W Scott McGraw; Peter S Ungar; James D Pampush; Anna E Vick; E Anderson Bitty
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Abrasive, silica phytoliths and the evolution of thick molar enamel in primates, with implications for the diet of Paranthropus boisei.

Authors:  Diana Rabenold; Osbjorn M Pearson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Human enamel thickness and ENAM polymorphism.

Authors:  Diane M Daubert; Joanna L Kelley; Yuriy G Udod; Carolina Habor; Chris G Kleist; Ilona K Furman; Igor N Tikonov; Willie J Swanson; Frank A Roberts
Journal:  Int J Oral Sci       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 6.344

9.  Evolutionary analysis of selective constraints identifies ameloblastin (AMBN) as a potential candidate for amelogenesis imperfecta.

Authors:  Frédéric Delsuc; Barbara Gasse; Jean-Yves Sire
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  To What Extent is Primate Second Molar Enamel Occlusal Morphology Shaped by the Enamel-Dentine Junction?

Authors:  Franck Guy; Vincent Lazzari; Emmanuel Gilissen; Ghislain Thiery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.