Literature DB >> 9774003

Fat necrosis in free and pedicled TRAM flaps.

S S Kroll1, G Gherardini, J E Martin, G P Reece, M J Miller, G R Evans, G L Robb, B G Wang.   

Abstract

One purported advantage of the free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction is that, compared with the conventional TRAM flap, it has a better blood supply and therefore a lower incidence of fat necrosis. We tested this claim by reviewing the incidence of fat necrosis, both clinically and mammographically, in a group of 110 patients with 116 TRAM flap breast reconstructions who had undergone mammography of their reconstructed breasts. Of the 49 breasts reconstructed with free TRAM flaps, 4 (8.2 percent) had clinically evident fat necrosis, and 1 (2.0 percent) had fat necrosis that was detectable by mammography. Of the 67 breasts reconstructed with conventional TRAM flaps, 18 (26.9 percent) had clinically detectable fat necrosis, and 9 (13.4 percent) had fat necrosis that was detectable mammographically. Both of these differences were statistically significant (p = 0.0113 for clinical fat necrosis; p = 0.031 for mammographic fat necrosis). Fat necrosis was more common in patients who were obese or had a history of smoking, but neither association was statistically significant. We conclude that the use of the free TRAM flap reduces the incidence of fat necrosis in the reconstructed breast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9774003     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

Review 1.  Issues related to choice of breast reconstruction in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Kristina O'Shaughnessy; Neil Fine
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2006-03

Review 2.  Multimodality Imaging of the Reconstructed Breast.

Authors:  Beatriz E Adrada; Gary J Whitman; Melissa A Crosby; Selin Carkaci; Mark J Dryden; Basak E Dogan
Journal:  Curr Probl Diagn Radiol       Date:  2015-04-27

Review 3.  Treatment Algorithm of Postsurgical Fat Necrosis of the Breast-Revisited.

Authors:  Oriana Haran; Carolina Legarda; Dina Gofstein; Dana Adelson; Roei Singolda; Ehab Madah; Ehud Arad; Andrew E Grush; Yoav Barnea
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.195

4.  Destination Design msTRAM: For Greater Reconstructive Certainty.

Authors:  Stahs Pripotnev; J Scott Williamson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2021-07-28

5.  Considering the Optimal Timing of Breast Reconstruction With Abdominal Flaps With Adjuvant Irradiation in 370 Consecutive Pedicled Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous Flap and Free Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Performed in a Chinese Oncology Center: Is There a Significant Difference Between Immediate and Delayed?

Authors:  Shanshan He; Jian Yin; Geoffrey L Robb; Jingyan Sun; Xuehui Zhang; Haixin Li; Jing Liu; Chunyong Han
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Development of a mouse model of abdominal cutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Daniel John Womac; Arun Prathap Palanisamy; Rene Eslick; Dennis Kenneth Schimpf; Kenneth David Chavin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Obesity and surgical wound healing: a current review.

Authors:  Yvonne N Pierpont; Trish Phuong Dinh; R Emerick Salas; Erika L Johnson; Terry G Wright; Martin C Robson; Wyatt G Payne
Journal:  ISRN Obes       Date:  2014-02-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.