Literature DB >> 9773988

Photogrammetric comparison of two methods for synchronous repair of bilateral cleft lip and nasal deformity.

M P Kohout1, L M Aljaro, L G Farkas, J B Mulliken.   

Abstract

The principle of synchronous repair of bilateral complete cleft lip and nasal deformity is established, and the techniques are evolving. We undertook photogrammetric comparison of the method described by Mulliken (group I, n = 15) and that described by Trott (group II, n = 10). Facial proportions and angles were measured on preoperative and postoperative photographs using defined anthropometric points. The following criteria were quantified for each test group: nasolabial angle, nasal tip angle and projection, nasal width, columellar length and width, and philtral width. All parameters in both groups were compared against each other and against normal age-matched values. Results were analyzed by t test. The nasolabial angle, nasal tip angle, and nasal width were abnormally wide for both techniques (p < 0.01 for both), and there was no difference between them. Nasal tip projection was greater than normal in both techniques (p < 0.01); group I had significantly greater projection than group II (p = 0.02). Columellar length as a proportion of nasal tip protrusion approached normal in group I but was significantly shorter than normal in group II (p < 0.001). Columellar width, as a proportion of nasal width, was normal for both groups. Philtral width, in proportion to nasal width, was normal in group I and abnormally high in group II (p < 0.001). This difference was significant between the two groups (p < 0.001). In a separate cohort of 10 group I patients, the nasolabial angle was measured on lateral photographs taken 1 year post-repair and at intervals to late childhood and adolescence. Nasolabial angle changed with age from obtuse to normal in 7 of 10 patients followed to 9 years of age and in 5 of 6 patients followed until age 15 years. Columellar and upper labial inclination to the vertical were measured in 7 of these patients at 3 to 4 years and again at 13 to 15 years. There was an increase in inclination of both columella and the upper lip, between the ages of 3 to 4 and 13 to 15 years, reflecting improved lip support and growth of septum and lateral cartilages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9773988     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199810000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  7 in total

1.  Cleft nasal deformity and rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Yoav Kaufman; Edward P Buchanan; Erik M Wolfswinkel; William M Weathers; Samuel Stal
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Dependence of columella development on the technique used for primary cleft lip closure.

Authors:  Vedat Yildirim; Julia Kaiser; Alexander Hemprich; Karsten Winter; Niels Christian Pausch
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-10-30

3.  Repair of bilateral cleft lip and its variants.

Authors:  John B Mulliken
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10

4.  Esthetic evaluation of the treated unilateral cleft lip using photographs and image analysis software: a retrospective study.

Authors:  S Sabitha; M Veerabahu; B Vikraman
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-06-28

Review 5.  Methods to quantify soft-tissue based facial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sander Brons; Machteld E van Beusichem; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Jos Draaisma; Stefaan J Bergé; Thomas J Maal; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Columella Elongation Surgery Outcome in Complete Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate.

Authors:  Daiana Broll; Telma V de Souza; Eudes Nobrega; Cristiane L Luz; Carlos E Repeke; Luiz C da Silva; Daniela G Garib; Terumi O Ozawa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-03-25

7.  Morphological Analysis of Nose in Patients of Tessier No. 0 Cleft With a Bifid Nose in China.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Huan Wang; Jianjun You; Ruobing Zheng; Yihao Xu; Xulong Zhang; Junsheng Guo; Fei Fan
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 3.418

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.