Literature DB >> 9773632

[The clinical grading of subarachnoid hemorrhage].

A Ducati1.   

Abstract

Clinical grading scales for subarachnoid haemorrhages are exposed and discussed. These have been introduced by Botterell, in the middle fifties, to allow a better clinical evaluation, a more correct prognosis and, as a consequence, a more effective therapy. The most popular grading scale is, up to now, the one proposed by Hunt and Hess in 1968. The H-H scale divides patients in 5 groups or levels, whose severity is progressively increasing. A clinical study based on the H-H scale demonstrated that low grade patients (I-II) take advantage from early surgery; at the opposite, high grade patients (III-IV-V) achieve better results when treated with late surgery. To leave behind several difficulties in interpreting the clinical signs and therefore in using the H-H scale, in 1988 Drake, on behalf of the World Federation of Neuro-logical Surgeons, published an "universal" grading scale for subarachnoid haemorrhage, based upon the well known Glasgow Come Scale score and on the finding of a motor focal deficit. The WFNS Scale is nowadays recommended for universal use, being easy and compatible with formerly employed scales.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9773632

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  1 in total

Review 1.  Clinical prediction models for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review.

Authors:  Blessing N R Jaja; Michael D Cusimano; Nima Etminan; Daniel Hanggi; David Hasan; Don Ilodigwe; Hector Lantigua; Peter Le Roux; Benjamin Lo; Ada Louffat-Olivares; Stephan Mayer; Andrew Molyneux; Audrey Quinn; Tom A Schweizer; Thomas Schenk; Julian Spears; Michael Todd; James Torner; Mervyn D I Vergouwen; George K C Wong; Jeff Singh; R Loch Macdonald
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.210

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.