Literature DB >> 9773352

Regression analysis of multiple protein structures.

T D Wu1, S C Schmidler, T Hastie, D L Brutlag.   

Abstract

A general framework is presented for analyzing multiple protein structures using statistical regression methods. The regression approach can superimpose protein structures rigidly or with shear. Also, this approach can superimpose multiple structures explicitly, without resorting to pairwise superpositions. The algorithm alternates between matching corresponding landmarks among the protein structures and superimposing these landmarks. Matching is performed using a robust dynamic programming technique that uses gap penalties that adapt to the given data. Superposition is performed using either orthogonal transformations, which impose the rigid-body assumption, or affine transformations, which allow shear. The resulting regression model of a protein family measures the amount of structural variability at each landmark. A variation of our algorithm permits a separate weight for each landmark, thereby allowing one to emphasize particular segments of a protein structure or to compensate for variances that differ at various positions in a structure. In addition, a method is introduced for finding an initial correspondence, by measuring the discrete curvature along each protein backbone. Discrete curvature also characterizes the secondary structure of a protein backbone, distinguishing among helical, strand, and loop regions. An example is presented involving a set of seven globin structures. Regression analysis, using both affine and orthogonal transformations, reveals that globins are most strongly conserved structurally in helical regions, particularly in the mid-regions of the E, F, and G helices.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9773352     DOI: 10.1089/cmb.1998.5.585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Biol        ISSN: 1066-5277            Impact factor:   1.479


  5 in total

1.  Approximate protein structural alignment in polynomial time.

Authors:  Rachel Kolodny; Nathan Linial
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  BAYESIAN PROTEIN STRUCTURE ALIGNMENT.

Authors:  Abel Rodriguez; Scott C Schmidler
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  BAYESIAN ALIGNMENT OF SIMILARITY SHAPES.

Authors:  Kanti V Mardia; Christopher J Fallaize; Stuart Barber; Richard M Jackson; Douglas L Theobald
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.083

4.  ProCKSI: a decision support system for Protein (structure) Comparison, Knowledge, Similarity and Information.

Authors:  Daniel Barthel; Jonathan D Hirst; Jacek Błazewicz; Edmund K Burke; Natalio Krasnogor
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Changes in correlation between promoter methylation and gene expression in cancer.

Authors:  Matahi Moarii; Valentina Boeva; Jean-Philippe Vert; Fabien Reyal
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.969

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.