Literature DB >> 9771658

Electrophysiological monitoring in clinical trials. Roche Neuropathy Study Group.

V Bril1, R Ellison, M Ngo, B Bergstrom, D Raynard, H Gin.   

Abstract

Electrophysiological testing remains an important efficacy parameter in clinical neuropathy trials. The quality of nerve conduction studies in reported trials varies greatly, and may be responsible for negative results. We report the utilization of an expert core lab for electrophysiological testing. With the core lab, the variability of repeat testing is comparable to that of a single, excellent laboratory. Motor conduction velocities demonstrated a coefficient of variation of 3% and sensory conduction velocities 4% across 60 study sites. The distal motor evoked potential amplitudes varied by 13% at the ankle, and 10% at the wrist. The sensory potential amplitudes varied by 16% at the ankle, and 11% at the wrist in 60 sites. The overall monitoring rate in all submitted nerve conduction tracings was 36.6%. Our results show that an expert core lab can improve the electrophysiological quality of clinical trial data with the potential to show small changes in nerve conduction velocities and in both motor and sensory potential amplitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9771658     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4598(199811)21:11<1368::aid-mus2>3.0.co;2-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  14 in total

1.  Follow-up of advanced diabetic neuropathy: useful variables and possible pitfalls.

Authors:  H H Krämer; R Rolke; M Hecht; A Bickel; F Birklein
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 2.  Diagnosis and management of diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Bruce A Perkins; Vera Bril
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Measurement of somatic neuropathy for clinical practice and clinical trials.

Authors:  L V Scott; S Tesfaye
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.810

4.  Diabetic neuropathy: a cross-sectional study of the relationships among tests of neurophysiology.

Authors:  Christopher H Gibbons; Roy Freeman; Aristidis Veves
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements using automation.

Authors:  Xuan Kong; Eugene A Lesser; J Thomas Megerian; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Efficacy and safety of pregabalin 600 mg/d for treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Joseph C Arezzo; Julio Rosenstock; Linda Lamoreaux; Lynne Pauer
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 2.474

7.  Ranirestat for the management of diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy.

Authors:  Vera Bril; Toshiyuki Hirose; Sasagu Tomioka; Robert Buchanan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Repeatability of nerve conduction measurements derived entirely by computer methods.

Authors:  Xuan Kong; Eugene A Lesser; Shai N Gozani
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-11-06       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Reliability and validity of the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy.

Authors:  V Bril; S Tomioka; R A Buchanan; B A Perkins
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.359

10.  Sensitivities of conventional and new electrophysiological techniques in carpal tunnel syndrome and their relationship to body mass index.

Authors:  Recep Aygül; Hzir Ulvi; Dilcan Kotan; Mutlu Kuyucu; Recep Demir
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2009-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.