Literature DB >> 9771155

Are critically ill older patients treated differently than similarly ill younger patients?

A E Stillman1, L E Braitman, R J Grant.   

Abstract

Our goal was to determine whether critically ill older patients are treated differently than middle-aged patients. If so, what factors besides age contribute to that difference? Internal medicine residents (n = 46) and practicing internists (n = 41) received 8 clinical vignettes of 4 critically ill 85-year-old patients and 4 critically ill 50-year-old patients. Each patient had a distinct premorbid mental and physical state. Each respondent selected from 4 levels of therapeutic aggressiveness for each patient. The main outcome measure was the proportion of physicians who intended to treat the older of each matched pair of patients less aggressively than the younger one (that is, downgraded for age). Eight physicians (9%) treated a previously unimpaired 85-year-old patient less aggressively than a comparable 50-year-old patient. When the matched patients were either premorbidly mentally or physically impaired (but not both), about 20% of physicians downgraded for age. Most downgraded for age in matched patients who were premorbidly both mentally and physically impaired. We conclude that age alone does not engender much therapeutic bias against older patients as long as they are physically and mentally intact before the onset of their acute illness. As premorbid disabilities multiply, older patients may be treated less aggressively than younger ones with similar impairments and clinical presentations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9771155      PMCID: PMC1305199     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  7 in total

1.  Facts on aging. A short quiz.

Authors:  E Palmore
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1977-08

2.  A factor analysis of attitudes toward the aged.

Authors:  H A Rosencranz; T E McNevin
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1969

3.  Interest in geriatrics at a university Department of Medicine.

Authors:  A John; K Steel
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Factors associated with do-not-resuscitate orders: patients' preferences, prognoses, and physicians' judgments. SUPPORT Investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment.

Authors:  R B Hakim; J M Teno; F E Harrell; W A Knaus; N Wenger; R S Phillips; P Layde; R Califf; A F Connors; J Lynn
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Attitudes toward the geriatric patient among family practice residents.

Authors:  A J Maxwell; N Sullivan
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Epidemiology of do-not-resuscitate orders. Disparity by age, diagnosis, gender, race, and functional impairment.

Authors:  N S Wenger; M L Pearson; K A Desmond; E R Harrison; L V Rubenstein; W H Rogers; K L Kahn
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1995-10-23

7.  Who decides? Physicians' willingness to use life-sustaining treatment.

Authors:  L C Hanson; M Danis; J M Garrett; E Mutran
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1996-04-08
  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Global reach of ageism on older persons' health: A systematic review.

Authors:  E-Shien Chang; Sneha Kannoth; Samantha Levy; Shi-Yi Wang; John E Lee; Becca R Levy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.