BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the adenosine-triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel opener pinacidil as a blood cardioplegic agent. METHODS: Using a blood-perfused, parabiotic, Langendorff rabbit model, hearts underwent 30 minutes of normothermic ischemia protected with blood cardioplegia (St. Thomas' solution [n = 8] or Krebs-Henseleit solution with pinacidil [50 micromol/L, n = 81) and 30 minutes of reperfusion. Percent recovery of developed pressure, mechanical arrest, electrical arrest, reperfusion ventricular fibrillation, percent tissue water, and myocardial oxygen consumption were compared. RESULTS: The percent recovery of developed pressure was not different between the groups (52.3 +/- 5.9 and 52.8 +/- 6.9 for hyperkalemic and pinacidil cardioplegia, respectively). Pinacidil cardioplegia was associated with prolonged electrical and mechanical activity (14.4 +/- 8.7 and 6.1 +/- 3.9 minutes), compared with hyperkalemic cardioplegia (1.1 +/- 0.6 and 1.1 +/- 0.6 minutes, respectively; p < 0.05). Pinacidil cardioplegia was associated with a higher reperfusion myocardial oxygen consumption (0.6 +/- 0.1 versus 0.2 +/- 0.0 mL/100 g myocardium/beat; p < 0.05) and a higher percent of tissue water (79.6% +/- 0.7% versus 78.6% +/- 1.2%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Systolic recovery was not different between groups, demonstrating comparable effectiveness of pinacidil and hyperkalemic warm blood cardioplegia.
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the adenosine-triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel opener pinacidil as a blood cardioplegic agent. METHODS: Using a blood-perfused, parabiotic, Langendorff rabbit model, hearts underwent 30 minutes of normothermic ischemia protected with blood cardioplegia (St. Thomas' solution [n = 8] or Krebs-Henseleit solution with pinacidil [50 micromol/L, n = 81) and 30 minutes of reperfusion. Percent recovery of developed pressure, mechanical arrest, electrical arrest, reperfusion ventricular fibrillation, percent tissue water, and myocardial oxygen consumption were compared. RESULTS: The percent recovery of developed pressure was not different between the groups (52.3 +/- 5.9 and 52.8 +/- 6.9 for hyperkalemic and pinacidil cardioplegia, respectively). Pinacidil cardioplegia was associated with prolonged electrical and mechanical activity (14.4 +/- 8.7 and 6.1 +/- 3.9 minutes), compared with hyperkalemic cardioplegia (1.1 +/- 0.6 and 1.1 +/- 0.6 minutes, respectively; p < 0.05). Pinacidil cardioplegia was associated with a higher reperfusion myocardial oxygen consumption (0.6 +/- 0.1 versus 0.2 +/- 0.0 mL/100 g myocardium/beat; p < 0.05) and a higher percent of tissue water (79.6% +/- 0.7% versus 78.6% +/- 1.2%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Systolic recovery was not different between groups, demonstrating comparable effectiveness of pinacidil and hyperkalemic warm blood cardioplegia.