Literature DB >> 9768798

Neuromuscular effects of rocuronium during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and intravenous anesthesia.

D W Lowry1, R K Mirakhur, G J McCarthy, M T Carroll, K C McCourt.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The potency and time course of action of rocuronium were studied in patients anesthetized with 66% nitrous oxide in oxygen and 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration of sevoflurane or isoflurane, or a propofol infusion. Potency was estimated by using the single-bolus technique. Neuromuscular block was measured by stimulation of the ulnar nerve and by recording the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle. The mean (95% confidence limits) of the 50% and 95% effective doses were estimated tobe 142 (129-157) and 265 (233-301) microg/ kg, 165 (146-187) and 324 (265-396) microg/kg, and 183 (163-207) and 398 (316-502) microg/kg during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively (P < 0.05 for sevoflurane versus propofol). The mean +/- SD times to onset of maximal block after rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg were 0.96 +/- 0.16, 0.90 +/- 0.16, and 1.02 +/- 0.15 min during sevoflurane, isoflurane, and propofol anesthesia, respectively. The respective times to recovery of the first response in the train-of-four (TOF) stimulation (T1) to 25% and 90% were 45 +/- 13.1 and 83 +/- 29.3 min, 35 +/- 6.1 and 56 +/- 15.9 min, and 35 +/- 9.2 and 55 +/- 19.4 min. The times to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.8 were 103 +/- 30.7, 69 +/- 20.4, and 62 +/- 21.1 min, and the 25%-75% recovery indices were 26 +/- 11.7, 12 +/- 5.0, and 14 +/- 6.9 min, respectively. There were no differences among groups in the times for onset of action or to recovery of T1 to 25%. However, the times for recovery of T1 to 90%, TOF ratio to 0.8, and recovery index in the sevoflurane group were all significantly longer compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05, < 0.01, and < 0.01, respectively). We conclude that the effects of rocuronium, especially duration of action, are significantly enhanced during sevoflurane compared with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: In routine clinical use, the effects of rocuronium are enhanced by sevoflurane, in comparison with isoflurane and propofol anesthesia, and the recovery is slower. Particular attention should be paid to monitoring of neuromuscular block during sevoflurane anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9768798     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199810000-00036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  22 in total

1.  Efficacy of different doses of sugammadex after continuous infusion of rocuronium.

Authors:  Diego Soto Mesa; Mounir Fayad Fayad; Laura Pérez Arviza; Verónica Del Valle Ruiz; Fernando Cosío Carreño; Luis Arguelles Tamargo; Manuel Amorín Díaz; Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 1.337

2.  Effectiveness of the timing principle with high-dose rocuronium during rapid sequence induction with lidocaine, remifentanil and propofol.

Authors:  Takahiro Suzuki; Mayu Aono; Naoko Fukano; Makiko Kobayashi; Shigeru Saeki; Setsuro Ogawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Measurement of blood-oxygen saturation using a photoacoustic technique in the rabbit hypoxemia model.

Authors:  Kiguna Sei; Masanori Fujita; Takeshi Hirasawa; Shinpei Okawa; Toshihiro Kushibiki; Hidenori Sasa; Kenichi Furuya; Miya Ishihara
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis for sugammadex-mediated reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade.

Authors:  Huub J Kleijn; Daniel P Zollinger; Michiel W van den Heuvel; Thomas Kerbusch
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Vecuronium requirement during liver transplantation under sevoflurane anesthesia.

Authors:  Kook-Hyun Lee; Soon-Ho Nam; Seung-Yeon Yoo; Chul-Woo Jung; Seng-Sim Bae; Jeong-Rim Lee
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Effect of remimazolam on intraoperative neuromonitoring during thyroid surgery: a case series.

Authors:  Kengo Hayamizu; Tomohiro Chaki; Shunsuke Tachibana; Naoyuki Hirata; Michiaki Yamakage
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 2.078

7.  The effect of alfentanil versus ketamine on the intubation condition and hemodynamics with low-dose rocuronium in children.

Authors:  Ji Young Kim; Jong Seok Lee; Hee Yeon Park; Yong Beom Kim; Youngjun Kwon; Hyun Jeong Kwak
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 2.078

8.  Comparative pharmacodynamics of pancuronium, cisatracurium, and CW002 in rabbits.

Authors:  Leslie L Diaz; Jingwei Zhang; Paul M Heerdt
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Comparison of intubating conditions between rocuronium with priming and without priming: Randomized and double-blind study.

Authors:  M Hanumantha Rao; Andal Venkatraman; R Mallleswari
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2011-09

10.  Sensitivity to rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block and reversibility with sugammadex in a patient with myotonic dystrophy.

Authors:  Akihiro Kashiwai; Takahiro Suzuki; Setsuro Ogawa
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.