Literature DB >> 9768795

A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.

J Brimacombe1, C Keller, R Morris, D Mecklem.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A disposable (polyvinyl chloride) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with dimensions identical to, but physical properties different from (stiffer tube/thicker cuff), the reusable (silicone) LMA has recently become available. We performed a randomized, cross-over study of 60 paralyzed, anesthetized patients to test the hypothesis that the use of these devices was different in terms of ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, fiberoptic position, and changes in intracuff pressure during N2O anesthesia. We also tested the hypothesis that the airway sealing pressure of the LMA is suboptimal if the cuff is inflated to a high intracuff pressure. Both the devices were inserted into each patient in random order, and their performance was assessed at two intracuff pressures (60 and 180 cm H2O) by a blind observer. Subsequently, intracuff pressures were measured during N2O anesthesia for the second device. Ease of insertion was similar: there was no difference in first attempt success rates (97% vs 98%) and insertion times (15 vs 13 s) for the disposable and reusable LMA, respectively. There were no differences in airway sealing pressure or fiberoptic position. Airway sealing pressure was significantly higher at 60 cm H2O intracuff pressure compared with the airway sealing pressure at 180 cm H2O for both devices (P < 0.02). During N2O anesthesia, the intracuff pressure remained stable for the disposable LMA but increased significantly for the reusable LMA. We conclude that the disposable and reusable LMAs perform similarly in paralyzed adult patients, but that the disposable LMA has more stable intracuff pressures during N2O anesthesia. Inflation of the LMA to high intracuff pressures produces a suboptimal seal. IMPLICATIONS: This randomized, single-blind, within-patient study of 60 adult patients shows that the disposable (polyvinyl chloride) and reusable (silicone) laryngeal mask airways perform similarly, but that the disposable laryngeal mask airway has more stable intracuff pressures during N2O anesthesia. Inflation of either device to high intracuff pressures produces a suboptimal seal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9768795     DOI: 10.1097/00000539-199810000-00033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Methods of airway management in prehospital emergency medicine].

Authors:  W Keul; M Bernhard; A Völkl; R Gust; A Gries
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  The air-Q(®) intubating laryngeal airway vs the LMA-ProSeal(TM) : a prospective, randomised trial of airway seal pressure.

Authors:  R E Galgon; K M Schroeder; S Han; A Andrei; A M Joffe
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Comparison of the standard and triple airway maneuvering techniques for i-gel™ placement in patients undergoing elective surgery: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  İlkay Baran Akkuş; Fatma Kavak Akelma; Merve Emlek; Derya Özkan; Jülide Ergil; Reyhan Polat
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  Inferior alveolar nerve injury with laryngeal mask airway: a case report.

Authors:  Deepak Hanumanthaiah; Sarmad Masud; Anil Ranganath
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2011-03-29

5.  Tracheal tube and laryngeal mask cuff pressure during anaesthesia - mandatory monitoring is in need.

Authors:  Kim Z Rokamp; Niels H Secher; Ann M Møller; Henning B Nielsen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.217

6.  Comparison of i-gel™ and laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized paralyzed patients.

Authors:  Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian; Navid Nouraei; Seyed Sadjad Razavi; Ebrahim Zaker; Alireza Jafari; Parivash Eftekhari; Golnar Radmand; Seyed Amir Mohajerani; Badiozzaman Radpay
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

7.  Unilateral hypoglossal nerve palsy after use of the laryngeal mask airway supreme.

Authors:  Kenichi Takahoko; Hajime Iwasaki; Tomoki Sasakawa; Akihiro Suzuki; Hideki Matsumoto; Hiroshi Iwasaki
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-08-31

8.  ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway Placement: A Comparison of Blind versus Direct Laryngoscopic Insertion Techniques.

Authors:  Pooja Chandrakanth Patil; Manjunath Abloodu Chikkapillappa; Vinayak Seenappa Pujara; Tejesh Channasandra Anandswamy; Leena Harshad Parate; Yatish Bevinaguddaiah
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

9.  Comparative Study of Two Laryngeal Mask Airways: Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway and Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway in Anesthetized Paralyzed Adults Undergoing Elective Surgery.

Authors:  Ravneet Kaur Gill; Abhijit Tarat; Debagopal Pathak; Suneeta Dutta
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

10.  Baby cuff as a reason for laryngeal mask airway cuff malfunction during airway management for anesthesia.

Authors:  Jafar Rahimi Panahi; Ata Mahmoodpoor; Samad E J Golzari; Hassan Soleimanpour
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-07
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.