Literature DB >> 9768719

Operator volume and outcome of patients undergoing coronary stent placement.

A Kastrati1, F J Neumann, A Schömig.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the relation between operator experience in coronary stent placement procedures and the clinical outcome of patients.
BACKGROUND: The results of coronary balloon angioplasty are closely related to the experience of the operator performing the procedure. Data on the effect of operator experience on the results after coronary stent placement are missing.
METHODS: The study included 3,409 consecutive patients undergoing coronary stent placement for the management of coronary artery disease. A composite end point of cardiac death, myocardial infarction and aortocoronary bypass surgery during the first 30 days after the intervention, was the primary end point and the procedural failure was the secondary end point of the study.
RESULTS: Adverse clinical outcome occurred in 2.99% of the 3,409 patients undergoing coronary stent placement. Procedural failure was recorded in 2.08% of the patients. Operator volumes above 483 procedures were associated with a risk-adjusted adverse outcome rate of 1.70%+/-1.28%, which is significantly lower than the overall rate of 2.99%. Operator yearly volumes of under 90 procedures were associated with a risk-adjusted adverse outcome rate of 4.59%+/-1.17%, which is significantly higher than the overall rate of 2.99%. The operator experience was an independent predictor even after adjusting for the effect of other risk factors. The analysis demonstrated that an experience of at least 100 procedures is required to obtain better outcome even in patients with simple coronary lesions and that operators should perform at least 70 procedures annually to expect a better outcome in patients with both simple and complex coronary lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Operator experience is a significant and independent predictor of the outcome of patients undergoing coronary stent placement. An experience of at least 100 procedures and an annual volume of at least 70 procedures are required to ensure a significantly better outcome after coronary stent implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9768719     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00334-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  12 in total

1.  [Position document on quality assurance in invasive cardiology. Are minimum numbers in percutaneous coronary angioplasty evidence based?].

Authors:  A Vogt; Ruth H Strasser
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-10

Review 2.  The relationship between hospital or operator volume and outcomes of coronary patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  A Dibra; A Kastrati; H Schühlen; A Schömig
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-04

3.  Effects of lesion complexity on baseline and postprocedural B-type natriuretic peptide levels in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  Aylin Yildirir; Sadik Acikel; Cagatay Ertan; Alp Aydinalp; Bulent Ozin; Haldun Muderrisoglu
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2007

4.  Outcomes of PCI in Relation to Procedural Characteristics and Operator Volumes in the United States.

Authors:  Alexander C Fanaroff; Pearl Zakroysky; David Dai; Daniel Wojdyla; Matthew W Sherwood; Matthew T Roe; Tracy Y Wang; Eric D Peterson; Hitinder S Gurm; Mauricio G Cohen; John C Messenger; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 5.  [Improved quality of coronary diagnostics and interventions by virtual reality simulation].

Authors:  W Voelker; S Maier; B Lengenfelder; W Schöbel; J Petersen; A Bonz; G Ertl
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  How to target uncertainty in Dutch invasive cardiovascular care.

Authors:  G A J Jessurun; J O J Peels; F Zijlstra
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.380

7.  Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery standby.

Authors:  Jörg Carlsson; Stefan N James; Elisabeth Ståhle; Sebastian Höfer; Bo Lagerqvist
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  In-hospital outcomes after elective and non-elective percutaneous coronary interventions in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery backup.

Authors:  Ulrich Tebbe; Matthias Hochadel; Peter Bramlage; Sebastian Kerber; Rainer Hambrecht; Eberhard Grube; Karl E Hauptmann; Martin Gottwik; Albrecht Elsässer; Hans-Georg Glunz; Tassilo Bonzel; Jörg Carlsson; Uwe Zeymer; Ralf Zahn; Jochen Senges
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Debate: Unstable angina - When should we intervene?

Authors:  Dean J Kereiakes
Journal:  Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000

10.  Quality of reporting internal and external validity data from randomized controlled trials evaluating stents for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Morgane Ethgen; Lsabelle Boutron; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Carine Roy; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.