Literature DB >> 9768570

Future directions for allergen immunotherapy.

T A Platts-Mills1, G A Mueller, L M Wheatley.   

Abstract

Over the last 30 years several approaches to modify immunotherapy have been tested, including allergoids, alum precipitation, and most recently peptides. However, none of these have replaced the traditional regimens. Over the same period our scientific understanding of allergic disease has been transformed. Today it is possible to identify and monitor changes occurring during treatment and to target many different aspects of the immune system. Recombinant technology provides a powerful technique both for sequencing proteins and producing allergens in commercial quantities. The recombinant proteins can be modified by site-directed mutagenesis so as to decrease their reactivity with IgE antibodies while maintaining reactivity with T cells. Knowledge of the tertiary structure of allergens will make it simpler to identify and change surface epitopes. A completely different approach is to use plasmids to introduce the genes for an allergen. The strength of this technique is that the plasmid can be designed to control expression and also to influence the cytokine profile of the response or the isotype of antibodies produced. Finally, different adjuvants can be used with proteins to alter the response. These include IL-12, immunostimulatory sequences of DNA, and bacterial proteins such as those used in HibVax. It is now possible to identify the cells that control the immune response to allergens and to design treatments that will either downregulate or change the response of T cells. The challenge is to transform this information into an effective treatment for allergic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9768570     DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70117-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  7 in total

Review 1.  Allergen immunotherapy: does it work and, if so, how and for how long?

Authors:  D S Robinson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Variable expression of pathogenesis-related protein allergen in mountain cedar (Juniperus ashei) pollen.

Authors:  T Midoro-Horiuti; R M Goldblum; A Kurosky; T G Wood; E G Brooks
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 5.422

3.  Plant-expressed recombinant mountain cedar allergen Jun a 1 is allergenic and has limited pectate lyase activity.

Authors:  Zun Liu; Shikha Bhattacharyya; Bo Ning; Terumi Midoro-Horiuti; Edmund W Czerwinski; Randall M Goldblum; Andrew Mort; Christopher M Kearney
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Immunol       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 2.749

4.  Homology modeling and characterization of IgE binding epitopes of mountain cedar allergen Jun a 3.

Authors:  K V Soman; T Midoro-Horiuti; J C Ferreon; R M Goldblum; E G Brooks; A Kurosky; W Braun; C H Schein
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Novel drugs for treating asthma.

Authors:  T T Hansel; P J Barnes
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.806

6.  Consensus Guidelines on Practical Issues of Immunotherapy-Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI).

Authors:  Eric Leith; Tom Bowen; Joe Butchey; David Fischer; Harold Kim; Bill Moote; Peter Small; Don Stark; Susan Waserman
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 3.406

7.  Rapid induction of tumor-specific type 1 T helper cells in metastatic melanoma patients by vaccination with mature, cryopreserved, peptide-loaded monocyte-derived dendritic cells.

Authors:  Beatrice Schuler-Thurner; Erwin S Schultz; Thomas G Berger; Georg Weinlich; Susanne Ebner; Petra Woerl; Armin Bender; Bernadette Feuerstein; Peter O Fritsch; Nikolaus Romani; Gerold Schuler
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 14.307

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.