Literature DB >> 9768345

Use of L-asparaginase in childhood ALL.

H J Müller1, J Boos.   

Abstract

Owing to the high efficacy of L-asparaginase in the treatment of acute lymphatic leukaemia the enzyme was introduced into the chemotherapy schedules for remission induction of this disease shortly after results of large-scale clinical trials had become available. Since asparaginase monotherapy was associated with a high response rate but short remission duration, the enzyme is currently employed within the framework of combination chemotherapy schedules which achieve treatment response in about 90% and long-term remissions in the majority of patients. Recently initiated clinical trials have still confirmed the eminent value of asparaginase in the combination chemotherapy of acute lymphatic leukaemia and of some subtypes of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and its important role as an essential component of multimodal treatment protocols. Despite the unique mechanism of action of this cytotoxic substance which shows relative selectivity with regard to the metabolism of malignant cells, some patients experience toxic effects during asparaginase therapy. Immunological reactions toward the foreign protein include enzyme inactivation without any clinical manifestations as well as anaphylactic shock. Severe functional disorders of organ systems result from the impaired homeostasis of the amino acids asparagine and glutamine. The changes affecting the proteins of the coagulation system have considerable clinical impact as they may induce bleeding as well as thromboembolic events and may be associated with life-threatening complications when the central nervous system is involved. Risk factors predisposing to thromboembolic complications are hereditary resistance against activated protein C and any other hereditary thrombophilia. Other organ systems potentially affected by relevant functional disorders are the central nervous system, the liver, and the pancreas, with patients who have a history of pancreatic disorders carrying an especially high risk of developing pancreatitis. Studies on the mechanisms of action and the occurrence of resistance phenomena have shown that a treatment response may only be expected if the malignant cells are unable to increase their asparagine synthetase activity to an extent providing enough asparagine to the cell; one may thus conclude that the enzyme-induced asparagine depletion of the serum constitutes the decisive cytotoxic mechanism. Independent of the asparagine depletion related cytotoxicity however, there are other mechanisms of clinical relevance like induction of apoptosis. Besides this, further influences on signal transduction cannot be excluded. Only few publications have dealt with the question of minimum trough activities to be ensured before each subsequent asparaginase dose in order to maintain uninterrupted asparagine depletion under treatment, and answers to this problem are not definitive. Clinical studies using enzymes from E. coli strains indicate that a trough activity of 100 U/l will suffice for complete asparagine depletion of the fluid body compartments with the preparations studied. These findings have been transferred to enzymes from other E. coli strains as well as those isolated from Erwinia chrysanthemi and to the PEG-conjugated E. coli asparaginases. It might be desirable to countercheck the results for confirmation or correction. The dosage and administration schedule of the various enzyme preparations required for complete asparagine depletion over a period of time have been insufficiently defined. While pharmacokinetic studies showed clinically relevant differences in biological activity and activity half-lives for enzymes from different biological sources, the findings of recently published clinical trials indicate that the therapeutic efficacy is affected when different asparaginase preparations are given by identical therapy schedules. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9768345     DOI: 10.1016/s1040-8428(98)00015-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol        ISSN: 1040-8428            Impact factor:   6.312


  104 in total

1.  Polyethylene Glycol-conjugated L-asparaginase versus native L-asparaginase in combination with standard agents for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in second bone marrow relapse: a Children's Oncology Group Study (POG 8866).

Authors:  Joanne Kurtzberg; Barbara Asselin; Mark Bernstein; George R Buchanan; Brad H Pollock; Bruce M Camitta
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.289

2.  Acute myeloid leukemia with mediastinal myeloid sarcoma refractory to acute myeloid leukemia therapy but responsive to L-asparaginase.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Takahashi; Katsuyoshi Koh; Motohiro Kato; Hiroshi Kishimoto; Eiji Oguma; Ryoji Hanada
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.490

Review 3.  Asparagine synthetase chemotherapy.

Authors:  Nigel G J Richards; Michael S Kilberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 23.643

4.  Overexpression of asparagine synthetase and matrix metalloproteinase 19 confers cisplatin sensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Ran-Yi Liu; Zizheng Dong; Jianguo Liu; Ling Zhou; Wenlin Huang; Sok Kean Khoo; Zhongfa Zhang; David Petillo; Bin Tean Teh; Chao-Nan Qian; Jian-Ting Zhang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  High incidence of symptomatic hyperammonemia in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia receiving pegylated asparaginase.

Authors:  Katja M J Heitink-Pollé; Berthil H C M T Prinsen; Tom J de Koning; Peter M van Hasselt; Marc B Bierings
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2012-07-01

6.  Successful challenges using native E. coli asparaginase after hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated E. coli asparaginase.

Authors:  C A Fernandez; E Stewart; J C Panetta; M R Wilkinson; A R Morrison; F D Finkelman; J T Sandlund; C H Pui; S Jeha; M V Relling; P K Campbell
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Adipocytes cause leukemia cell resistance to L-asparaginase via release of glutamine.

Authors:  Ehsan A Ehsanipour; Xia Sheng; James W Behan; Xingchao Wang; Anna Butturini; Vassilios I Avramis; Steven D Mittelman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  The cross-reactivity of anti-asparaginase antibodies against different L-asparaginase preparations.

Authors:  Beata Zalewska-Szewczyk; Agnieszka Gach; Krystyna Wyka; Jerzy Bodalski; Wojciech Młynarski
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  Arginine depriving enzymes: applications as emerging therapeutics in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Neha Kumari; Saurabh Bansal
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Functional analysis of a novel DNA polymorphism of a tandem repeated sequence in the asparagine synthetase gene in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells.

Authors:  Tadayuki Akagi; Dong Yin; Norihiko Kawamata; Claus R Bartram; Wolf-K Hofmann; Jee Hoon Song; Carl W Miller; Monique L den Boer; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.156

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.