L Liu1, K Meers, A Capurso, T O Engebretson, A S Glicksman. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Roger Williams Medical Center/Brown University, and Quality Assurance Review Center, Providence, RI, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the physical and mental status change during and after a course of radiation treatment in patients with cancer. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: Twenty-four patients with various malignant diseases were enrolled, including 9 men and 15 women, whose median age was 64.5, to receive radiation therapy. All patients also received psychosocial support from nurses, social workers, and/or organized support groups. The Rand 36-item survey 1.0 (SF-36) was completed at the beginning, the second week, the completion of treatment, and 1 and 3 months after treatment for the evaluation of physical component scores and mental component scores. Karnofsky performance scale and toxicity scores were determined by the treating nurses and physicians. RESULTS: The physical component scores of evaluated patients before treatment were approximately 20% lower than those of the general U.S. population, whereas mental component scores were similar to those of the general U.S. population. After treatment started, Karnofsky performance scale decreased concurrently with an increased rate of toxicity. Both physical and mental component scores were relatively stable throughout the course of evaluation. Mental component scores were the only predictor of toxicity during the treatment. Karnofsky performance scale dropped to their lowest point at the completion of treatment and then improved at 1-month follow-up. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The patients who had higher mental component scores before treatment appeared to have higher, and improving, physical component scores throughout the course of evaluation. Along with complementary social support, the implementation of psychosocial support early and throughout the course of treatment may result in physical benefits and improving overall quality of life. Care should also be taken to make psychosocial support available to patients after the completion of treatment.
PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the physical and mental status change during and after a course of radiation treatment in patients with cancer. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY: Twenty-four patients with various malignant diseases were enrolled, including 9 men and 15 women, whose median age was 64.5, to receive radiation therapy. All patients also received psychosocial support from nurses, social workers, and/or organized support groups. The Rand 36-item survey 1.0 (SF-36) was completed at the beginning, the second week, the completion of treatment, and 1 and 3 months after treatment for the evaluation of physical component scores and mental component scores. Karnofsky performance scale and toxicity scores were determined by the treating nurses and physicians. RESULTS: The physical component scores of evaluated patients before treatment were approximately 20% lower than those of the general U.S. population, whereas mental component scores were similar to those of the general U.S. population. After treatment started, Karnofsky performance scale decreased concurrently with an increased rate of toxicity. Both physical and mental component scores were relatively stable throughout the course of evaluation. Mental component scores were the only predictor of toxicity during the treatment. Karnofsky performance scale dropped to their lowest point at the completion of treatment and then improved at 1-month follow-up. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The patients who had higher mental component scores before treatment appeared to have higher, and improving, physical component scores throughout the course of evaluation. Along with complementary social support, the implementation of psychosocial support early and throughout the course of treatment may result in physical benefits and improving overall quality of life. Care should also be taken to make psychosocial support available to patients after the completion of treatment.
Authors: Sefik Tagay; Stephan Herpertz; Matthias Langkafel; Yesim Erim; Andreas Bockisch; Wolfgang Senf; Rainer Görges Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 4.147