Literature DB >> 9766929

Plucked hair samples as a source of DNA: reliability of dinucleotide microsatellite genotyping.

B Goossens1, L P Waits, P Taberlet.   

Abstract

To test whether plucked hairs are a reliable source of DNA for genotyping microsatellite loci, we carried out experiments using one, three, or 10 hairs per extract for 50 alpine marmots. For each extract, seven independent genotypings were performed for the same locus (multiple-tubes approach). Two types of genotyping errors were recorded: a false homozygote defined as the detection of only one allele of a true heterozygote, and a false allele defined as a PCR-generated allele that was not one of the alleles of the true genotype. Using DNA extracted from one, three, or 10 hairs the overall error rate was 14.00%, 4.86%, and 0.29%, respectively. Based on our results, we conclude that 10 hairs should be used to obtain consistently reliable genotypings using the single-tube approach, and that a single plucked hair could represent a reliable source of DNA if the multiple-tubes approach is used. For future studies of dinucleotide repeat diversity using DNA extracted from one to three shed or plucked hairs, we strongly recommend initiating an appropriate pilot study to quantify the error rate and to determine the reliability of the single-tube approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9766929     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00407.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  13 in total

1.  Assessing allelic dropout and genotype reliability using maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Craig R Miller; Paul Joyce; Lisette P Waits
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Applying genomic data in wildlife monitoring: Development guidelines for genotyping degraded samples with reduced single nucleotide polymorphism panels.

Authors:  Alina von Thaden; Carsten Nowak; Annika Tiesmeyer; Tobias E Reiners; Paulo C Alves; Leslie A Lyons; Federica Mattucci; Ettore Randi; Margherita Cragnolini; José Galián; Zsolt Hegyeli; Andrew C Kitchener; Clotilde Lambinet; José M Lucas; Thomas Mölich; Luana Ramos; Vinciane Schockert; Berardino Cocchiararo
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 7.090

3.  Does kin selection influence fostering behaviour in Antarctic fur seals (Arctocephalus gazella)?

Authors:  Joseph I Hoffman; William Amos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Determining microsatellite genotyping reliability and mutation detection ability: an approach using small-pool PCR from sperm DNA.

Authors:  Anna J Macdonald; Stephen D Sarre; Nancy N Fitzsimmons; Nicola Aitken
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  Accurate determination of phenotypic information from historic thoroughbred horses by single base extension.

Authors:  Michael G Campana; C Mark Whitten; Ceiridwen J Edwards; Frauke Stock; Angela M Murphy; Matthew M Binns; Graeme W W Barker; Mim A Bower
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Profiling the dead: generating microsatellite data from fossil bones of extinct megafauna--protocols, problems, and prospects.

Authors:  Morten E Allentoft; Charlotte Oskam; Jayne Houston; Marie L Hale; M Thomas P Gilbert; Morten Rasmussen; Peter Spencer; Christopher Jacomb; Eske Willerslev; Richard N Holdaway; Michael Bunce
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Where have all the tadpoles gone? Individual genetic tracking of amphibian larvae until adulthood.

Authors:  Eva Ringler; Rosanna Mangione; Max Ringler
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Panel of polymorphic heterologous microsatellite loci to genotype critically endangered Bengal tiger: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sudhanshu Mishra; Sujeet Kumar Singh; Ashok Kumar Munjal; Jouni Aspi; Surendra Prakash Goyal
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-01-03

9.  Using pedigree reconstruction to estimate population size: genotypes are more than individually unique marks.

Authors:  Scott Creel; Elias Rosenblatt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Assessing SNP genotyping of noninvasively collected wildlife samples using microfluidic arrays.

Authors:  Alina von Thaden; Berardino Cocchiararo; Anne Jarausch; Hannah Jüngling; Alexandros A Karamanlidis; Annika Tiesmeyer; Carsten Nowak; Violeta Muñoz-Fuentes
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.