J M Goldstein1, L J Seidman, J M Goodman, D Koren, H Lee, S Weintraub, M T Tsuang. 1. Harvard Institute of Psychiatric Epidemiology and Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School at Massachusetts Mental Health Center, Boston 02115, USA. jmgoldst@warren.med.harvard.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies of sex differences in neuropsychological performance in schizophrenia report inconsistent results, due in part to methodological artifacts. The study presented here was specifically designed to examine sex differences in neuropsychological performance. It was hypothesized that schizophrenic women would exhibit fewer neuropsychological deficits than schizophrenic men and that their performance would be more similar to that of normal women than schizophrenic men's performance would be to that of normal men. METHOD: Thirty-one outpatients with DSM-III-R-defined schizophrenia were systematically sampled from an extensive service network serving a large urban catchment area for seriously mentally ill persons. Twenty-seven normal comparison subjects were matched within sex on the basis of age, parental socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and handedness. An extensive neuropsychological test battery was administered, and multivariate analysis of variance was used to test for the effects of sex and group and sex-by-group interactions. RESULTS: Male patients were significantly impaired across all functions in comparison with normal male subjects and on tests of attention, verbal memory, and executive functions in comparison with female patients. Female patients performed significantly worse than female normal comparison subjects only on tests of attention, executive functions, visual memory, and motor functions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that women with schizophrenia may be less vulnerable to particular cognitive deficits, especially those involving verbal processing, than schizophrenic men.
OBJECTIVE: Studies of sex differences in neuropsychological performance in schizophrenia report inconsistent results, due in part to methodological artifacts. The study presented here was specifically designed to examine sex differences in neuropsychological performance. It was hypothesized that schizophrenicwomen would exhibit fewer neuropsychological deficits than schizophrenicmen and that their performance would be more similar to that of normal women than schizophrenicmen's performance would be to that of normal men. METHOD: Thirty-one outpatients with DSM-III-R-defined schizophrenia were systematically sampled from an extensive service network serving a large urban catchment area for seriously mentally ill persons. Twenty-seven normal comparison subjects were matched within sex on the basis of age, parental socioeconomic status, ethnicity, and handedness. An extensive neuropsychological test battery was administered, and multivariate analysis of variance was used to test for the effects of sex and group and sex-by-group interactions. RESULTS: Male patients were significantly impaired across all functions in comparison with normal male subjects and on tests of attention, verbal memory, and executive functions in comparison with female patients. Female patients performed significantly worse than female normal comparison subjects only on tests of attention, executive functions, visual memory, and motor functions. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that women with schizophrenia may be less vulnerable to particular cognitive deficits, especially those involving verbal processing, than schizophrenicmen.
Authors: Krista M Wisner; Brita Elvevåg; James M Gold; Daniel R Weinberger; Dwight Dickinson Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Leah H Rubin; Gretchen L Haas; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney; Pauline M Maki Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2007-03-28 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: A Piton; J Gauthier; F F Hamdan; R G Lafrenière; Y Yang; E Henrion; S Laurent; A Noreau; P Thibodeau; L Karemera; D Spiegelman; F Kuku; J Duguay; L Destroismaisons; P Jolivet; M Côté; K Lachapelle; O Diallo; A Raymond; C Marineau; N Champagne; L Xiong; C Gaspar; J-B Rivière; J Tarabeux; P Cossette; M-O Krebs; J L Rapoport; A Addington; L E Delisi; L Mottron; R Joober; E Fombonne; P Drapeau; G A Rouleau Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2010-05-18 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: J M Goldstein; S Cherkerzian; L J Seidman; J-A L Donatelli; A G Remington; M T Tsuang; M Hornig; S L Buka Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2014-03-26 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Jill M Goldstein; Sara Cherkerzian; Larry J Seidman; Tracey L Petryshen; Garrett Fitzmaurice; Ming T Tsuang; Stephen L Buka Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2011-02-18 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Christian Gaser; Katja Patschurek-Kliche; Johanna Scheuerecker; Ronald Bottlender; Petra Decker; Gisela Schmitt; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Eva M Meisenzahl Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Margaret A Niznikiewicz; Michelle Friedman; Martha E Shenton; Martina Voglmaier; Paul G Nestor; Melissa Frumin; Larry Seidman; John Sutton; Robert W McCarley Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 4.016