Literature DB >> 9766594

Platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of the effect on transfusion requirements.

F D Rubens1, D Fergusson, P S Wells, M Huang, J L McGowan, A Laupacis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine whether intraoperative platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery is effective in reducing the proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic red cell transfusions.
METHODS: A systematic search for prospective, randomized trials of platelet-rich plasmapheresis in cardiac surgery, using MEDLINE, HEALTHSTAR, Current Contents, "Biological Abstracts," and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica up to August 1997, was completed. Trials were included if they reported either the proportion of patients exposed to allogeneic red cells or the units of allogeneic red cells transfused. Trials were abstracted by 2 independent investigators and the quality of trial design was assessed with the use of a validated scale.
RESULTS: Seventeen references met the inclusion criteria (1369 patients [675 control: 694 platelet-rich plasmapheresis]). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis reduced the likelihood of exposure to allogeneic red cells in cardiac surgery (odds ratio 0.44; 95% confidence interval 0.27, 0.72, P = .001). Platelet-rich plasmapheresis had a small but statistically significant effect on both the volume of blood lost in the first 24 hours (weighted mean difference -102 mL; 95% confidence interval -148, -55 mL, P < .0001) and the mean units transfused (weighted mean difference -0.33 units; 95% confidence interval -0.43, -0.23, P < .0001). However, platelet-rich plasmapheresis was only marginally effective (odds ratio 0.83, 95% confidence interval 0.34, 2.01, P = .68) for "good" quality trials, whereas it appeared very effective in trials with poor methodologic quality (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.17, 0.62, P = .0007).
CONCLUSIONS: Although platelet-rich plasmapheresis appeared effective in decreasing the proportion of patients receiving transfusions after cardiac operations, the quality of most of the supporting trials was low and the benefit was small in trials of good quality. Further clinical trials should be completed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9766594     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(98)70172-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  6 in total

Review 1.  Autologous platelet gel: fad or savoir? Do we really know?

Authors:  Alfred H Stammers; Cody C Trowbridge; Molly Marko; Edward L Woods; Nicholas Brindisi; James Pezzuto; Myra Klayman; Sean Fleming; Joseph Petzold
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2009-12

2.  Recommendations for the transfusion management of patients in the peri-operative period. II. The intra-operative period.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Francesco Bennardello; Angela Lattanzio; Pierluigi Piccoli; Gina Rossetti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  A meta-analysis of platelet gel for prevention of sternal wound infections following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Bilal H Kirmani; Siôn G Jones; Subir Datta; Edward K Mclaughlin; Andreas J Hoschtitzky
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Platelet-rich-plasmapheresis for minimising peri-operative allogeneic blood transfusion.

Authors:  Paul A Carless; Fraser D Rubens; Danielle M Anthony; Dianne O'Connell; David A Henry
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-03-16

5.  Cost effectiveness of epoetin-alpha to augment preoperative autologous blood donation in elective cardiac surgery.

Authors:  D Coyle; K M Lee; D A Fergusson; A Laupacis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Use of platelet gel and its effects on infection in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Cody C Trowbridge; Alfred H Stammers; Edward Woods; Bianca R Yen; Myra Klayman; Christian Gilbert
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2005-12
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.