Literature DB >> 9762503

Power-frequency fields and cancer.

J E Moulder1.   

Abstract

There is a widespread public perception that exposure to "EMF" is linked to cancer. This concern stems largely from a few epidemiological studies that appear to show an association between cancer and residence near power lines. However, the epidemiological evidence for such a link falls far short of that needed to conclude that a causal relationship exists, and examination of the biophysics leads to the conclusion that biological effects are implausible at the field strengths encountered in environmental settings. In a case such as this, where the epidemiological evidence for a link between an agent and a disease is weak to nonexistent and the effect is biophysically and/or biochemically implausible, laboratory evidence becomes critical for risk evaluation. The mechanisms of carcinogenesis are sufficiently well established that laboratory studies can be used to assess whether an agent has carcinogenic potential. There are approximately 100 published reports that have looked for evidence that power-frequency fields have genotoxic or epigenetic activity. These studies have found no replicated evidence that power-frequency fields have the potential to either cause or contribute to cancer. Of the few studies that have shown some evidence for carcinogenic activity, most have used exposure conditions with little relevance to real world exposure, none have been replicated, and many have failed direct attempts at replication. In conjunction with the epidemiology and biophysics, this leads to the conclusion that a causal association between power-frequency fields and cancer is not only unproven, but rather unlikely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9762503     DOI: 10.1615/critrevbiomedeng.v26.i1-2.10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0278-940X


  5 in total

1.  Intermittent extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields cause DNA damage in a dose-dependent way.

Authors:  Sabine Ivancsits; Elisabeth Diem; Oswald Jahn; Hugo W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Post-continuous whole body exposure of rabbits to 650 MHz electromagnetic fields: effects on liver, spleen, and brain.

Authors:  Patrizia Tarantino; Remigio Lanubile; Giovanni Lacalandra; Luigi Abbro; Luciana Dini
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2005-04-06       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Absence of DNA damage after 60-Hz electromagnetic field exposure combined with ionizing radiation, hydrogen peroxide, or c-Myc overexpression.

Authors:  Yeung Bae Jin; Seo-Hyun Choi; Jae Seon Lee; Jae-Kyung Kim; Ju-Woon Lee; Seung-Cheol Hong; Sung Ho Myung; Yun-Sil Lee
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Positive electrostatic therapy of metastatic tumors: selective induction of apoptosis in cancer cells by pure charges.

Authors:  Ashkan Zandi; Saeid Rafizadeh-Tafti; Fatemeh Shojaeian; Mohammad Ali Khayamian; Fereshteh Abbasvandi; Mohammad Faranoush; Robab Anbiaee; Sahar Najafikhoshnoo; Parisa Hoseinpour; Sepanta Assadi; Pouyan Katebi; Zahra Davari Sh; Shahriar Shalileh; Mohammad Salemizadeh Parizi; Shohreh Vanaei; Mohammadreza Ghaderinia; Hamed Abadijoo; Payam Taheri; Mohammad Reza Esmailinejad; Hassan Sanati; Mohammad Reza Rostami; Reza Sadeghian; Yasin Kordehlachin; S M Sadegh Mousavi-Kiasary; Amir Mamdouh; Seyyed Hossein Miraghaie; Hossein Baharvand; Mohammad Abdolahad
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Recurrence-Based Synchronization Analysis of Weakly Coupled Bursting Neurons under External ELF Fields.

Authors:  Aissatou Mboussi Nkomidio; Eulalie Ketchamen Ngamga; Blaise Romeo Nana Nbendjo; Jürgen Kurths; Norbert Marwan
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 2.524

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.