Literature DB >> 9761575

Outpatient endovascular intervention: is it safe?

F J Criado1, O Abdul-Khoudoud, M Twena, N S Clark, P Patten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of outpatient percutaneous endovascular intervention in the treatment of arterial occlusive disease.
METHODS: The records of 134 patients who underwent 151 outpatient endovascular procedures between 1992 and 1997 were reviewed retrospectively. According to established protocol, focal lower limb (n = 145) and subclavian (n = 6) arterial lesions requiring relatively straightforward endoluminal interventions were appropriate for outpatient management provided the patients were free of significant comorbidities. A percutaneous transfemoral approach was used for lower limb lesions, while subclavian angioplasty was performed via a brachial access. Heparin anticoagulation was administered conservatively. Patients were discharged 3 hours after sheath removal.
RESULTS: The majority (98%) of patients were discharged as planned. Three (2%) patients were observed overnight in the hospital for treatment of acute iliac artery thrombosis, puncture-site bleeding, and suboptimal angioplasty. No patient required hospitalization following discharge. Periprocedural morbidity was confined to 2 (1.5%) groin hematomas and 1 (0.7%) femoral pseudoaneurysm.
CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient endovascular intervention appears safe; however, proper case selection and technical excellence are inseparable components for the success of this strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9761575     DOI: 10.1583/1074-6218(1998)005<0236:OEIIIS>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1074-6218


  1 in total

1.  Preliminary Results of the Outpatient Endovascular and Interventional Society National Registry.

Authors:  Samuel S Ahn; Robert W Tahara; Lauren E Jones; Jeffrey G Carr; John Blebea
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 3.487

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.