Literature DB >> 9761294

Extreme responsiveness of the pupil of the dark-adapted mouse to steady retinal illumination.

M E Pennesi1, A L Lyubarsky, E N Pugh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the dependence of the size of the pupils of mice on steady retinal illumination.
METHODS: Anesthetized C57BL/6 mice aged 7 to 8 weeks were placed in a ganzfeld chamber in darkness, and in monochromatic (510 nm) and white light whose intensity was varied more than 6 log units. The pupils of the mice were photographed with an infrared video camera and recorded on videotape and the pupil areas determined by digital image analysis of the video recordings.
RESULTS: Fully dark-adapted murine pupils had an area of 2.29 +/- 0.35 mm2. The minimum pupil size at saturating intensity was 0.10 +/- 0.05 mm2. The steady state pupil area declined to half its dark-adapted maximum when ganzfeld luminance was 10(-5) scotopic candela (scot. cd) per meter squared. Pupil area declined to 20% of the dark-adapted magnitude at approximately 10(-3) scot. cd/m2.
CONCLUSIONS: The mouse pupil can regulate retinal illumination by a factor exceeding 20. The neural circuitry that determines steady state murine pupil size is extremely sensitive to retinal illumination and under these experimental conditions is controlled almost exclusively by rod signals. This follows, because the ganzfeld illuminance (10(-5) scot. cd/m2) that causes the pupil to constrict to half its dark-adapted value corresponds to only approximately 0.01 photoisomerization per rod per second, whereas 80% reduction in pupil area occurs at approximately 1 photoisomerization per rod per sec. Based on this extreme responsiveness to steady illumination, the hypothesis is proposed that the murine pupil functions to protect a retinal circuit that can become saturated at extremely low photon capture rates. General principles of dark-adapted retinal circuitry support the identification of the first three neurons in the circuit as the rod, the rod bipolar, and the AII-amacrine. The rod and rod bipolar neurons do not approach saturation at the intensities at which the pupil constricts, however, and it seems unlikely that the AII-amacrine does. Thus the retinal neurons protected from saturation by the mouse pupil constrictions are probably ganglion cells with large receptive fields that have sustained responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9761294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  23 in total

1.  Connexin 36 and rod bipolar cell independent rod pathways drive retinal ganglion cells and optokinetic reflexes.

Authors:  Cameron S Cowan; Muhammad Abd-El-Barr; Meike van der Heijden; Eric M Lo; David Paul; Debra E Bramblett; Janis Lem; David L Simons; Samuel M Wu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Mice lacking G-protein receptor kinase 1 have profoundly slowed recovery of cone-driven retinal responses.

Authors:  A L Lyubarsky; C Chen; M I Simon; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A system to measure the pupil response to steady lights in freely behaving mice.

Authors:  Mark Bushnell; Yumiko Umino; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Ocular phenotype in a mouse gene knockout model for infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis.

Authors:  Bo Lei; Gregory E Tullis; Mark D Kirk; Keqing Zhang; Martin L Katz
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Scotopic visual signaling in the mouse retina is modulated by high-affinity plasma membrane calcium extrusion.

Authors:  Jacque L Duncan; Haidong Yang; Thuy Doan; Robert S Silverstein; Gabe J Murphy; George Nune; Xiaorong Liu; David Copenhagen; Bruce L Tempel; Fred Rieke; David Krizaj
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Pharmacologically stimulated pupil and accommodative changes in Guinea pigs.

Authors:  Lisa A Ostrin; Mariana B Garcia; Vivian Choh; Christine F Wildsoet
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Distinct contributions of rod, cone, and melanopsin photoreceptors to encoding irradiance.

Authors:  Gurprit S Lall; Victoria L Revell; Hiroshi Momiji; Jazi Al Enezi; Cara M Altimus; Ali D Güler; Carlos Aguilar; Morven A Cameron; Susan Allender; Mark W Hankins; Robert J Lucas
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Light perception in two strictly subterranean rodents: life in the dark or blue?

Authors:  Ondrej Kott; Radim Sumbera; Pavel Nemec
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  UV- and midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse: a possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments.

Authors:  A L Lyubarsky; B Falsini; M E Pennesi; P Valentini; E N Pugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Speed, spatial, and temporal tuning of rod and cone vision in mouse.

Authors:  Yumiko Umino; Eduardo Solessio; Robert B Barlow
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.