Literature DB >> 9760900

Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation. An experimental study in the rat.

A Lundgren1, D Lundgren, A Taylor.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to test perforated and non-perforated barriers for their ability to promote augmentation of bone tissue. More specifically, 1 totally occlusive barrier and 6 barriers with perforation sizes of about 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 300 microns and 1 group with no barriers placed (open test chambers) were used to test the effect of a barrier's occlusiveness on the amount and composition of augmented tissue over time. The skull of the rat was used as the experimental area. Prefabricated, flexible silicone frames with an inferior flange for peripheral sealing to the bone surface and a central vertical through hole with a diameter of 3.6 mm and a height of 2 mm were used as test chambers. The barriers were inserted to cover the superior opening of the through hole. The healing periods were 4, 8, and 12 weeks. All test chambers exhibited newly formed skull bone which was augmented over time. The placement of totally occlusive barriers resulted in the slowest rate of bone tissue augmentation but in a highly predictable manner, i.e., there were only small individual variations. Placement of barriers with perforations exceeding 10 microns, on the other hand, resulted in a faster rate of bone augmentation with larger individual variations and a totally different augmentation pattern. A pronounced augmentation of calvarial soft tissue from the sagittal suture of the skull as well as ingrowth of suprabony connective tissue through the barriers were also observed. After 12 weeks of healing, no differences in the amount of augmented mineralized bone related to perforation sizes > 10 microns were found. The open test chambers also showed bone augmentation, although most of their volume was occupied by suprabony connective tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9760900     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090406.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  13 in total

1.  Rigid occlusive titanium barriers for alveolar bone augmentation: two reports with 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Wilfried Engelke; Oscar Deccó; Andrea C Cura; Eduardo Borie; Víctor Beltrán
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-04-15

2.  Occlusive barriers in combination with particulate Bio-Oss® graft: a pilot study on rabbit calvaria.

Authors:  Víctor Beltrán; Wilfried Engelke; Fernando Jose Dias; Carolina Leiva; Ramón Fuentes; Eduardo Borie
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-07-15

3.  Synthetic biodegradable hydrogel delivery of demineralized bone matrix for bone augmentation in a rat model.

Authors:  Lucas A Kinard; Rebecca L Dahlin; Johnny Lam; Steven Lu; Esther J Lee; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 8.947

4.  Micro-computed tomography analysis of early stage bone healing using micro-porous titanium mesh for guided bone regeneration: preliminary experiment in a canine model.

Authors:  Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia; Yasunori Ayukawa; Yohei Jinno; Akihiro Furuhashi; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.634

5.  Engaging a polylactide copolymer in oral tissue regeneration: first validation of Suprathel® for guided epithelial and osseous healing.

Authors:  Sergiu Vacaras; Grigore Baciut; Dan Gheban; Simion Bran; Horatiu Colosi; Septimiu Toader; Daiana Opris; Winfried Kretschmer; Avram Manea; Gabriel Armencea; Mihaela Baciut; Horia Opris; Ileana Mitre; Mihaela Hedesiu; Cristian Dinu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr

6.  Guided bone augmentation using ceramic space-maintaining devices: the impact of chemistry.

Authors:  Jonas Anderud; Peter Abrahamsson; Ryo Jimbo; Sten Isaksson; Erik Adolfsson; Johan Malmström; Yoshihito Naito; Ann Wennerberg
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2015-03-12

7.  Effects of Titanium Mesh Surfaces-Coated with Hydroxyapatite/β-Tricalcium Phosphate Nanotubes on Acetabular Bone Defects in Rabbits.

Authors:  Thuy-Duong Thi Nguyen; Tae-Sung Bae; Dae-Hyeok Yang; Myung-Sik Park; Sun-Jung Yoon
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Dehydrothermally Cross-Linked Collagen Membrane with a Bone Graft Improves Bone Regeneration in a Rat Calvarial Defect Model.

Authors:  Yin-Zhe An; Young-Ku Heo; Jung-Seok Lee; Ui-Won Jung; Seong-Ho Choi
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 9.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

10.  Gingival fibroblasts prevent BMP-mediated osteoblastic differentiation.

Authors:  Mandeep S Ghuman; Maher Al-Masri; Guilherme Xavier; Martyn T Cobourne; Ian J McKay; Francis J Hughes
Journal:  J Periodontal Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.