Literature DB >> 9760895

Peri-implant microflora of implants with cemented and screw retained suprastructures.

W Keller1, U Brägger, A Mombelli.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to compare clinical and microbiological features in the peri-implant area of implants carrying either screw retained or cemented suprastructures, and to investigate the relationship between the peri-implant microflora, the microbiota on the inner surface of removable suprastructures, and the periodontal microflora within the same subject. In 15 partially edentulous patients with ITI implants used as abutments for crown and bridge reconstructions, microbial samples were taken i) from the deepest periodontal pocket of each quadrant, ii) from the sulcus of the implants and iii) from the internal surface of the screw retained suprastructures. The samples were cultured using continuous anaerobic techniques. Five patients were found with both screw retained (S) and cemented (C) suprastructures. In these subjects the mean total cultivable counts were significantly higher in peri-implant samples from group C than in samples from group S. Furthermore, peri-implant samples of group S yielded a higher proportion of coccoid cells in the darkfield microscope and demonstrated absence of large spirochetes. From the 15 patients, Porphyromas gingivalis was detected in 10% of the periodontal samples and in only one peri-implant sample. Prevotella intermedia was detected in 33% of the periodontal and in 30% of the peri-implant samples. Fusobacterium spp. had a prevalence of 58% in the periodontal samples and was recovered from 50% of the peri-implant samples. Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans was not detected in any dental or peri-implant sample. In 1 case, however, the organism was recovered from the internal surface of the suprastructure. Linear regression analysis showed a significant relationship between the frequency of micro-organisms in peri-implant samples of group S and in samples from the inner surface of the suprastructure. Furthermore, there was a significant correlation between the incidence of micro-organisms in dental samples and i) in peri-implant samples of group S and ii) in samples from the internal suprastructure surface. These findings indicate, that the microbial leakage through the gap between the suprastructure and the abutment plays an important role in the bacterial colonization of the internal part of screw retained crowns and bridges. The study furthermore confirms the impact of the dental microflora on the microbial colonization of implants. This factor appears to be more important than the mode of fixation of the suprastructure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9760895     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090401.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  10 in total

1.  Microbiological dynamics of red complex bacteria following full-mouth air polishing in periodontally healthy subjects-a randomized clinical pilot study.

Authors:  Belinda Reinhardt; Astrid Klocke; Sarah H Neering; Sabine Selbach; Ulrike Peters; Thomas F Flemmig; Thomas Beikler
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Effect of cement washout on loosening of abutment screws and vice versa in screw- and cement- retained implant-supported dental prosthesis.

Authors:  Seok-Gyu Kim; Chae-Heon Chung; Mee-Kyoung Son
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Metagenomic analysis of the peri-implant and periodontal microflora in patients with clinical signs of gingivitis or mucositis.

Authors:  Wieland Heuer; Andreas Kettenring; Sascha Nico Stumpp; Jörg Eberhard; Eva Gellermann; Andreas Winkel; Meike Stiesch
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinician- and patient-reported long-term evaluation of screw- and cement-retained implant restorations: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  Sami Sherif; Srinivas M Susarla; Jae-Woong Hwang; Hans-Peter Weber; Robert F Wright
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Factors determining the retentiveness of luting agents used with metal- and ceramic-based implant components.

Authors:  Cornelia Schiessl; Lina Schaefer; Christian Winter; Jan Fuerst; Martin Rosentritt; Florian Zeman; Michael Behr
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Evaluation of subgingival microbiota around single tooth implants.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Tamrakar; G Murali; Shyam Singh; R Shakila
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2020-04-15

7.  Comparative evaluation of microleakage of metallic copings luted with three different commercially available luting cements: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Mohit Handa; Pratibha Marya; Varun Gupta; Sumit Chopra
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar

8.  The Efficacy of a Diode Laser on Titanium Implants for the Reduction of Microorganisms That Cause Periimplantitis.

Authors:  Anna Wawrzyk; Michał Łobacz; Agnieszka Adamczuk; Weronika Sofińska-Chmiel; Mansur Rahnama
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Microleakage at Implant Abutment and Prosthesis Interface in Cemented Implant-Supported Prosthesis.

Authors:  Soni Kumari; Manish Shivaji Jadhav; Vishal Gupta; Tarun Koshy Isaac; Angel Subramanium; Vinit Kumar
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

10.  Biofilm and dental implant: The microbial link.

Authors:  Sangeeta Dhir
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.