Literature DB >> 9759525

The addition of CO2 to traditional taste solutions alters taste quality.

B J Cowart1.   

Abstract

Previous studies of the effect of carbonation on taste perception have suggested that it may be negligible, manifesting primarily in increases in the perceived intensity of weak salt and sour stimuli. Assuming CO2 solutions in the mouth stimulate only trigeminal nerve endings, this result is not altogether surprising; however, there are neurophysiological data indicating that CO2 stimulates gustatory as well as trigeminal fibers. In that case, carbonation might alter the quality profile of a stimulus without producing substantial changes in overall taste intensity--much as occurs when qualitatively different taste stimuli are mixed. To address this possibility, subjects were asked to rate the total taste intensity of moderate concentrations of stimuli representing each of the basic tastes and their binary combinations, with an without added carbonation. They then subdivided total taste intensity into the proportions of sweetness, saltiness, sourness, bitterness and 'other taste qualities' they perceived. The addition of carbonation produced only small increases in ratings of total taste intensity. However, rather dramatic alterations in the quality profiles of stimuli were observed, particularly for sweet and salty tastes. The nature of the interaction is consistent with a direct effect of carbonation/CO2 on the gustatory system, although the possibility that at least some of the observed effects reflect trigeminal-gustatory interactions cannot be ruled out.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9759525     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/23.4.397

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  3 in total

1.  Neurobiological and psychophysical mechanisms underlying the oral sensation produced by carbonated water.

Authors:  C T Simons; J M Dessirier; M I Carstens; M O'Mahony; E Carstens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Chemogenic Subqualities of Mouthfeel.

Authors:  Christopher T Simons; Amanda H Klein; Earl Carstens
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Monitoring gaseous CO2 and ethanol above champagne glasses: flute versus coupe, and the role of temperature.

Authors:  Gérard Liger-Belair; Marielle Bourget; Hervé Pron; Guillaume Polidori; Clara Cilindre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.