Literature DB >> 9758032

In vivo osteogenesis assay: a rapid method for quantitative analysis.

J E Dennis1, E K Konstantakos, D Arm, A I Caplan.   

Abstract

A quantitative in vivo osteogenesis assay is a useful tool for the analysis of cells and bioactive factors that affect the amount or rate of bone formation. There are currently two assays in general use for the in vivo assessment of osteogenesis by isolated cells: diffusion chambers and porous calcium phosphate ceramics. Due to the relative ease of specimen preparation and reproducibility of results, the porous ceramic assay was chosen for the development of a rapid method for quantitating in vivo bone formation. The ceramic cube implantation technique consists of combining osteogenic cells with 27-mm3 porous calcium phosphate ceramics, implanting the cell-ceramic composites subcutaneously into an immuno-tolerant host, and, after 2-6 weeks, harvesting and preparing the ceramic implants for histologic analysis. A drawback to the analysis of bone formation within these porous ceramics is that the entire cube must be examined to find small foci of bone present in some samples; a single cross-sectional area is not representative. For this reason, image analysis of serial sections from ceramics is often prohibitively time-consuming. Two alternative scoring methodologies were tested and compared to bone volume measurements obtained by image analysis. The two subjective scoring methods were: (1) Bone Scale: the amount of bone within pores of the ceramic implant is estimated on a scale of 0-4 based on the degree of bone fill (0=no bone, 1=up to 25%, 2=25 to 75%, 4=75 to 100% fill); and (2) Percentage Bone: the amount of bone is estimated by determining the percentage of ceramic pores which contain bone. Every tenth section of serially sectioned cubes was scored by each of these methods under double-blind conditions, and the Bone Scale and Percentage Bone results were directly compared to image analysis measurements from identical samples. Correlation coefficients indicate that the Percentage Bone method was more accurate than the Bone Scale scoring method. The Bone Scale scoring method gave an r2=0.767 while the Percentage Bone method gave a value of 0.902. These results indicate that scoring ceramic cubes by the percentage of pores containing bone gives a result that corresponds to image analysis measurements at nearly a 90% confidence level. Thus, the Percentage Bone method of scoring is an accurate and relatively quick scoring method for in vivo bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9758032     DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00170-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  19 in total

1.  A cultured living bone equivalent enhances bone formation when compared to a cell seeding approach.

Authors:  S C Mendes; M Sleijster; A Van Den Muysenberg; J D De Bruijn; C A Van Blitterswijk
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 2.  New era of cell-based orthopedic therapies.

Authors:  Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 3.  Mesenchymal stem cells: a new trend for cell therapy.

Authors:  Xin Wei; Xue Yang; Zhi-peng Han; Fang-fang Qu; Li Shao; Yu-fang Shi
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Transportation conditions for prompt use of ex vivo expanded and freshly harvested clinical-grade bone marrow mesenchymal stromal/stem cells for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Elena Veronesi; Alba Murgia; Anna Caselli; Giulia Grisendi; Maria Serena Piccinno; Valeria Rasini; Rosaria Giordano; Tiziana Montemurro; Philippe Bourin; Luc Sensebé; Markus T Rojewski; Hubert Schrezenmeier; Pierre Layrolle; Maria Pau Ginebra; Carmen Bunu Panaitescu; Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Fabio Catani; Paolo Paolucci; Jorge S Burns; Massimo Dominici
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 3.056

5.  MSC frequency correlates with blood vessel density in equine adipose tissue.

Authors:  Lindolfo da Silva Meirelles; Theodore T Sand; Robert J Harman; Donald P Lennon; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells and translational medicine: emerging issues.

Authors:  Guangwen Ren; Xiaodong Chen; Fengping Dong; Wenzhao Li; Xiaohui Ren; Yanyun Zhang; Yufang Shi
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 6.940

7.  Transplantation of fetal instead of adult fibroblasts reduces the probability of ectopic ossification during tendon repair.

Authors:  Zhi Fang; Ting Zhu; Wei Liang Shen; Qiao Mei Tang; Jia Lin Chen; Zi Yin; Jun Feng Ji; Boon Chin Heng; Hong Wei Ouyang; Xiao Chen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.845

8.  Nondestructive/Noninvasive Imaging Evaluation of Cellular Differentiation Progression During In Vitro Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Chondrogenesis.

Authors:  Diego Correa; Rodrigo A Somoza; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Efficient lentiviral transduction of human mesenchymal stem cells that preserves proliferation and differentiation capabilities.

Authors:  Paul Lin; Yuan Lin; Donald P Lennon; Diego Correa; Mark Schluchter; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 6.940

10.  Mesenchymal stem cells regulate melanoma cancer cells extravasation to bone and liver at their perivascular niche.

Authors:  Diego Correa; Rodrigo A Somoza; Paul Lin; William P Schiemann; Arnold I Caplan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 7.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.