Literature DB >> 9757982

Outcomes of very low birth weight twins cared for in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network's intensive care units.

E F Donovan1, R A Ehrenkranz, S Shankaran, D K Stevenson, L L Wright, N Younes, A A Fanaroff, S B Korones, B J Stoll, J E Tyson, C R Bauer, J A Lemons, W Oh, L A Papile.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study's aim was to compare outcomes of very low birth weight twins with those of matched singletons. STUDY
DESIGN: With data from the Neonatal Research Network registry (May 1991 to December 1994), univariable and multivariable comparisons of very low birth weight twin pairs and singletons were performed in 2 subgroups: (1) all paired twins and singletons with birth weights between 401 and 1500 g and (2) all paired twins and singletons born at <28 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: Twins constituted 19% of infants admitted with very low birth weight. Mothers of twins were more likely to receive prenatal care, have labor, have cesarean delivery, and receive antenatal glucocorticoids. Twins were more likely to have respiratory disease and to receive surfactant. Second-born twins had more early respiratory disease but similar longer-term outcomes. The risks of death, chronic lung disease, and grade III or IV intracranial hemorrhage were similar in twins and singletons.
CONCLUSIONS: Although very low birth weight twins compose a sizable proportion of admissions, in National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network intensive care units, twins and singletons have similar outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9757982     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70075-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  9 in total

1.  Contemporary risks of maternal morbidity and adverse outcomes with increasing maternal age and plurality.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Follow-up issues with multiples.

Authors:  Aideen M Moore; Karel O'Brien
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Application of a validated prediction model for in vitro fertilization: comparison of live birth rates and multiple birth rates with 1 embryo transferred over 2 cycles vs 2 embryos in 1 cycle.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Morton B Brown; Ethan Wantman; Judy E Stern; Valerie L Baker; Eric Widra; Charles C Coddington; William E Gibbons; Bradley J Van Voorhis; G David Ball
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-02-13       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Effect of birth order on neonatal morbidity and mortality among very low birthweight twins: a population based study.

Authors:  E S Shinwell; I Blickstein; A Lusky; B Reichman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  Perinatal Outcome of the Second Twin at a Tertiary Care Center in India.

Authors:  Hiralal Konar; Madhutandra Sarkar; Joydip Paul
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-07-14

6.  Excess risk of mortality in very low birthweight triplets: a national, population based study.

Authors:  E S Shinwell; I Blickstein; A Lusky; B Reichman
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.747

7.  Twin gestation and neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Rajan Wadhawan; William Oh; Rebecca L Perritt; Scott A McDonald; Abhik Das; W Kenneth Poole; Betty R Vohr; Rosemary D Higgins
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-01-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Prevalence and predictors of early breastfeeding among late preterm mother-infant dyads.

Authors:  Jill Radtke Demirci; Susan M Sereika; Debra Bogen
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Twin's Birth-Order Differences in Height and Body Mass Index From Birth to Old Age: A Pooled Study of 26 Twin Cohorts Participating in the CODATwins Project.

Authors:  Yoshie Yokoyama; Aline Jelenkovic; Reijo Sund; Joohon Sung; John L Hopper; Syuichi Ooki; Kauko Heikkilä; Sari Aaltonen; Adam D Tarnoki; David L Tarnoki; Gonneke Willemsen; Meike Bartels; Toos C E M van Beijsterveldt; Kimberly J Saudino; Tessa L Cutler; Tracy L Nelson; Keith E Whitfield; Jane Wardle; Clare H Llewellyn; Abigail Fisher; Mingguang He; Xiaohu Ding; Morten Bjerregaard-Andersen; Henning Beck-Nielsen; Morten Sodemann; Yun-Mi Song; Sarah Yang; Kayoung Lee; Hoe-Uk Jeong; Ariel Knafo-Noam; David Mankuta; Lior Abramson; S Alexandra Burt; Kelly L Klump; Juan R Ordoñana; Juan F Sánchez-Romera; Lucia Colodro-Conde; Jennifer R Harris; Ingunn Brandt; Thomas Sevenius Nilsen; Jeffrey M Craig; Richard Saffery; Fuling Ji; Feng Ning; Zengchang Pang; Lise Dubois; Michel Boivin; Mara Brendgen; Ginette Dionne; Frank Vitaro; Nicholas G Martin; Sarah E Medland; Grant W Montgomery; Patrik K E Magnusson; Nancy L Pedersen; Anna K Dahl Aslan; Per Tynelius; Claire M A Haworth; Robert Plomin; Esther Rebato; Richard J Rose; Jack H Goldberg; Finn Rasmussen; Yoon-Mi Hur; Thorkild I A Sørensen; Dorret I Boomsma; Jaakko Kaprio; Karri Silventoinen
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.587

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.