Literature DB >> 9757523

[Methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in Germany: results of a systemic assessment of guidelines presented on the Internet].

A Helou1, M Perleth, E M Bitzer, H Dörning, F W Schwartz.   

Abstract

Critics claim that most of the German clinical practice guidelines are of poor quality having produced by informal ad hoc methodologies without a rigorous approach. This paper reports on the systematic appraisal of 329 guidelines published online by the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (AWMF) in Germany. The results of this study suggest that most of the guidelines presented in Internet do not meet internationally recognised criteria for quality. Proposals are offered how to enhance the methodological quality of future guidelines.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9757523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich        ISSN: 1431-7621


  3 in total

1.  Improving the quality of health care: using international collaboration to inform guideline programmes by founding the Guidelines International Network (G-I-N).

Authors:  G Ollenschläger; C Marshall; S Qureshi; K Rosenbrand; J Burgers; M Mäkelä; J Slutsky
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-12

2.  [Critical remarks on the new diagnostic criteria for Menière's disease].

Authors:  M Westhofen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  A framework for assessing Health Economic Evaluation (HEE) quality appraisal instruments.

Authors:  Astrid Langer
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.