Literature DB >> 9756787

In vitro studies of pharmacodynamic properties of vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

E Löwdin1, I Odenholt, O Cars.   

Abstract

The bactericidal activities of vancomycin against two reference strains and two clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis were studied with five different concentrations ranging from 2x to 64x the MIC. The decrease in the numbers of CFU at 24 h was at least 3 log10 CFU/ml for all strains. No concentration-dependent killing was observed. The postantibiotic effect (PAE) was determined by obtaining viable counts for two of the reference strains, and the viable counts varied markedly: 1.2 h for S. aureus and 6.0 h for S. epidermidis. The determinations of the PAE, the postantibiotic sub-MIC effect (PA SME), and the sub-MIC effect (SME) for all strains were done with BioScreen C, a computerized incubator for bacteria. The PA SMEs were longer than the SMEs for all strains tested. A newly developed in vitro kinetic model was used to expose the bacteria to continuously decreasing concentrations of vancomycin. A filter prevented the loss of bacteria during the experiments. One reference strain each of S. aureus and S. epidermidis and two clinical isolates of S. aureus were exposed to an initial concentration of 10x the MIC of vancomycin with two different half-lives (t1/2s): 1 or 5 h. The post-MIC effect (PME) was calculated as the difference in time for the bacteria to grow 1 log10 CFU/ml from the numbers of CFU obtained at the time when the MIC was reached and the corresponding time for an unexposed control culture. The difference in PME between the strains was not as pronounced as that for the PAE. Furthermore, the PME was shorter when a t1/2 of 5 h (approximate terminal t1/2 in humans) was used. The PMEs at t1/2s of 1 and 5 h were 6.5 and 3.6 h, respectively, for S. aureus. The corresponding figures for S. epidermidis were 10.3 and less than 6 h. The shorter PMEs achieved with a t1/2 of 5 h and the lack of concentration-dependent killing indicate that the time above the MIC is the parameter most important for the efficacy of vancomycin.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9756787      PMCID: PMC105929     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  31 in total

1.  Vancomycin in severe staphylococcal infections.

Authors:  D B LOURIA; T KAMINSKI; J BUCHMAN
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1961-02

2.  Time-kill studies with oxacillin, vancomycin, and teicoplanin versus Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R N Greenberg; C A Benes
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  In-vitro comparison of the post-antibiotic effect of vancomycin and teicoplanin.

Authors:  M A Cooper; Y F Jin; J P Ashby; J M Andrews; R Wise
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Pharmacodynamic effects of sub-MICs of benzylpenicillin against Streptococcus pyogenes in a newly developed in vitro kinetic model.

Authors:  E Löwdin; I Odenholt; S Bengtsson; O Cars
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Effects of benzylpenicillin on Streptococcus pyogenes during the postantibiotic phase in vitro.

Authors:  I Odenholt; S E Holm; O Cars
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Advantages and disadvantages of an in-vitro model with two compartments connected by a dialyser: results of experiments with ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  D S Reeves
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Two compartment kinetic model with multiple artificial capillary units.

Authors:  J Blaser; B B Stone; S H Zinner
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Postantibiotic suppression of bacterial growth.

Authors:  R W Bundtzen; A U Gerber; D L Cohn; W A Craig
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb

9.  Pharmacodynamic effects of subinhibitory concentrations of beta-lactam antibiotics in vitro.

Authors:  I Odenholt-Tornqvist; E Löwdin; O Cars
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Pharmacodynamics of daptomycin and vancomycin on Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated by studies of initial killing and postantibiotic effect and influence of Ca2+ and albumin on these drugs.

Authors:  H Hanberger; L E Nilsson; R Maller; B Isaksson
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  30 in total

Review 1.  Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC.

Authors:  Markus Mueller; Amparo de la Peña; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Population dynamics of antibiotic treatment: a mathematical model and hypotheses for time-kill and continuous-culture experiments.

Authors:  Bruce R Levin; Klas I Udekwu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Functional relationship between bacterial cell density and the efficacy of antibiotics.

Authors:  Klas I Udekwu; Nicholas Parrish; Peter Ankomah; Fernando Baquero; Bruce R Levin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.790

4.  Postantibiotic effects of telavancin against 16 gram-positive organisms.

Authors:  G A Pankuch; P C Appelbaum
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill.

Authors:  Andrew A Udy; Jason A Roberts; Robert J Boots; David L Paterson; Jeffrey Lipman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Predicting in vitro antibacterial efficacy across experimental designs with a semimechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model.

Authors:  Elisabet I Nielsen; Otto Cars; Lena E Friberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Appropriate antibiotic dosage levels in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock.

Authors:  Fabio Silvio Taccone; Maya Hites; Marjorie Beumier; Sabino Scolletta; Frédérique Jacobs
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Cationic Branched Polyethylenimine (BPEI) Disables Antibiotic Resistance in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE).

Authors:  Anh K Lam; Melissa A Hill; Erika L Moen; Jennifer Pusavat; Cassandra L Wouters; Charles V Rice
Journal:  ChemMedChem       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.466

Review 9.  Pharmacokinetics of antibacterial agents in the CSF of children and adolescents.

Authors:  Amanda K Sullins; Susan M Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 10.  Glycopeptide antibiotics: from conventional molecules to new derivatives.

Authors:  Françoise Van Bambeke; Yves Van Laethem; Patrice Courvalin; Paul M Tulkens
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.