Literature DB >> 9756699

Buffer zones for reducing pesticide drift to ditches and risks to aquatic organisms.

G R de Snoo1, P J de Wit.   

Abstract

Pesticide drift from field sprayers fitted with different types of spray nozzles was investigated under various wind speed conditions. Droplet drift was measured adjacent to the sprayed field, on the ditch bank, and in the ditch. Measurements were carried out in the normal sprayed situation and with an unsprayed buffer zone 3 or 6 m wide. The results indicate that there are major differences between spray nozzles. Drift deposition increases with wind speed. In the sprayed situation and with a wind speed of 0.5 m/s, there was a maximum of 6.0% drift deposition halfway down the ditch bank and no drift deposition in the ditch. At 3 m/s wind speed these figures are 25.1 and 2.2%, respectively. At 5 m/s wind speed, 7.2% drift deposition was measured in the ditch. Risk assessment (cf. SLOOTBOX model) carried out with 17 pesticides used in the study area indicated that at this wind speed, 8 of the 17 pesticides investigated posed a risk to aquatic organisms. Creation of a 3-m buffer zone decreases drift deposition in the ditch by a minimum of 95%. Adjacent to the buffer zone only 4 of the 17 pesticides investigated posed a (minor) risk to aquatic organisms. With a 6-m buffer zone no drift deposition in the ditch could be measured (wind speed maximum, 4.5 m/s). Creating unsprayed crop edges offers good possibilities for the protection of aquatic ecosystems. Socioeconomic research among farmers indicates that buffer zones, such as unsprayed cereal edges and unsprayed grass strips, could well be adopted in agricultural practice. Copyright 1998 Academic Press.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9756699     DOI: 10.1006/eesa.1998.1678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf        ISSN: 0147-6513            Impact factor:   6.291


  5 in total

1.  Influence of soil organic matter on the sensitivity of selected wild and crop species to common herbicides.

Authors:  Jane E Allison; Céline Boutin; David Carpenter
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  A half-century analysis of landscape dynamics in southern Québec, Canada.

Authors:  Benoît Jobin; Claudie Latendresse; Alain Baril; Charles Maisonneuve; Céline Boutin; Dominique Côté
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Effect of two commercial herbicides on life history traits of a human disease vector, Aedes aegypti, in the laboratory setting.

Authors:  Alexandra Morris; Ebony G Murrell; Talan Klein; Bruce H Noden
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  Trends in Pesticide Concentrations in Streams of the Western United States, 1993-2005.

Authors:  Henry M Johnson; Joseph L Domagalski; Dina K Saleh
Journal:  J Am Water Resour Assoc       Date:  2011-04

5.  Chitosan and β-Cyclodextrin-epichlorohydrin Polymer Composite Film as a Plant Healthcare Material for Carbendazim-Controlled Release to Protect Rape against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum (Lib.) de Bary.

Authors:  Delong Wang; Mingchen Jia; Lanying Wang; Shuang Song; Juntao Feng; Xing Zhang
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2017-03-26       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.