Literature DB >> 975660

Newer knowledge of the immunology of bone and cartilage.

M W Elves.   

Abstract

By the use of modern techniques, the nature of the immunological response to bone and cartilage grafts is becoming clear. Fresh bone, whether cancellous or cortical, will elicit a cell-mediated immunological response; removal of the bone marrow has little effect in reducing immunogenicity. Antibodies against cellular components of the graft are detectable in the recipient only when host and donor have a disparity for the major histocompatibility (H) antigen. Treatment of bone grafts, for the bone bank, by freezing removes their immunogenicity with regard to antibody production but leaves them capable of stimulating the cellmediated immune response. Freeze drying, on the other hand, impairs immunogenicity for both types of responses. Cartilage, grafted alone, is probably non-antigenic as far as both immune responses are concerned and, although there have been a few reports of stimulation of CMI and antibody production by cartilage, these have not been confirmed. Cartilage cells do, however, possess antigens of the major H-antigen system. The cartilage graft is therefore antigenic but only feebly immunogenic, as the matrix proteoglycans protect the cells from the afferent arm of the immune response. Osteoarticular allografts, consisting of both bone and cartilage, sensitize the host due to their bone components. The effect of the immune response upon the bone allograft is to destroy the graft-derived first phase of osteogenesis which, in turn, leads to a poor or non-existent host phase of new bone formation in most allografts. The exact effector mechanism by means of which this destruction is brought about is not known. Bone grafts may be protected from the immune response by use of immunosuppressive measures. Cartilage enjoys a considerable measure of protection from immunological effectors by virtue of its matrix. If this breaks down then the cartilage can become permeable to antibodies. It is suggested that "lymphokines," produced by sensitized lymphocytes, may play some role in destroying the cartilage graft.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 975660

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  7 in total

1.  Early osteogenesis in compact bone isografts: a quantitative study of contributions of the different graft cells.

Authors:  J C Gray; M W Elves
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Bone transplantation.

Authors:  L Schweiberer; H Stützle; H K Mandelkow
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.067

3.  CORR Insights®: Vascularized Periosteal Flaps Accelerate Osteointegration and Revascularization of Allografts in Rats.

Authors:  Klaus Dieter Draenert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Chondrocytes.

Authors:  R A Stockwell
Journal:  J Clin Pathol Suppl (R Coll Pathol)       Date:  1978

5.  The fate of allogeneic grafts of intact bone marrow in immunologically tolerant recipients and after abrogation of the tolerance.

Authors:  N W Nisbet; J Menage
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1981-06

6.  Increased bone ingrowth distance into lipid-extracted bank bone at 6 weeks. A titanium chamber study in allogeneic and syngeneic rats.

Authors:  K Thorén; P Aspenberg
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  The effects of low-dose radiotherapy on fresh osteochondral allografts: An experimental study in rabbits.

Authors:  Uğur Gönç; Mehmet Çetinkaya; Mesut Atabek
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 1.511

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.