Literature DB >> 9754821

Assessment of insulin sensitivity and secretion with the labelled intravenous glucose tolerance test: improved modelling analysis.

A Mari1.   

Abstract

A new modelling analysis was developed to assess insulin sensitivity with a tracer-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). IVGTTs were performed in 5 normal (NGT) and 7 non-insulin-dependent diabetic (NIDDM) subjects. A 300 mg/kg glucose bolus containing [6,6-(2)H2]glucose was given at time 0. After 20 min, insulin was infused for 5 min (NGT, 0.03; NIDDM, 0.05 U/kg). Concentrations of tracer, glucose, insulin and C-peptide were measured for 240 min. A circulatory model for glucose kinetics was used. Glucose clearance was assumed to depend linearly on plasma insulin concentration delayed. Model parameters were: basal glucose clearance (Cl(b)), glucose clearance at 600 pmol/l insulin concentration (Cl600), basal glucose production (Pb), basal insulin sensitivity index (BSI = Cl(b)/basal insulin concentration); incremental insulin sensitivity index (ISI = slope of the relationship between insulin concentration and glucose clearance). Insulin secretion was calculated by deconvolution of C-peptide data. Indices of basal pancreatic sensitivity (PSIb) and first (PSI1) and second-phase (PSI2) sensitivity were calculated by normalizing insulin secretion to the prevailing glucose levels. Diabetic subjects were found to be insulin resistant (BSI: 2.3 +/- 0.6 vs 0.76 +/- 0.18 ml x min(-1) x m(-2) x pmol/l(-1), p < 0.02; ISI: 0.40 +/- 0.06 vs 0.13 +/- 0.05 ml x min(-1) x m(-2) x pmol/l(-1), p < 0.02; Cl600: 333 +/- 47 vs 137 +/- 26 ml x min(-1) x m(-2), p < 0.01; NGT vs NIDDM). Pb was not elevated in NIDDM (588 +/- 169 vs 606 +/- 123 micromol x min(-1) x m(-2), NGT vs NIDDM). Hepatic insulin resistance was however present as basal glucose and insulin were higher. PSI1 was impaired in NIDDM (67 +/- 15 vs 12 +/- 7 pmol x min x m(-2) x mmol/l(-1), p < 0.02; NGT vs NIDDM). In NGT and in a subset of NIDDM subjects (n = 4), PSIb was inversely correlated with BSI (r = 0.95, p < 0.0001, log transformation). This suggests the existence of a compensatory mechanism that increases pancreatic sensitivity in the presence of insulin resistance, which is normal in some NIDDM subjects and impaired in others. In conclusion, using a simple test the present analysis provides a rich set of parameters characterizing glucose metabolism and insulin secretion, agrees with the literature, and provides some new information on the relationship between insulin sensitivity and secretion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9754821     DOI: 10.1007/s001250051027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetologia        ISSN: 0012-186X            Impact factor:   10.122


  6 in total

1.  A minimal C-peptide sampling method to capture peak and total prehepatic insulin secretion in model-based experimental insulin sensitivity studies.

Authors:  Thomas Lotz; Uli Göltenbott; J Geoffrey Chase; Paul Docherty; Christopher E Hann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

2.  Human insulin dynamics in women: a physiologically based model.

Authors:  Michael Weiss; Andrea Tura; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Giovanni Pacini; David Z D'Argenio
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  The identification of insulin saturation effects during the dynamic insulin sensitivity test.

Authors:  Paul D Docherty; J Geoffrey Chase; Christopher E Hann; Thomas F Lotz; J Lin; Kirsten A McAuley; Geoffrey M Shaw
Journal:  Open Med Inform J       Date:  2010-07-27

4.  Glucose effectiveness in obese children: relation to degree of obesity and dysglycemia.

Authors:  Ram Weiss; Sheela N Magge; Nicola Santoro; Cosimo Giannini; Raymond Boston; Tara Holder; Melissa Shaw; Elvira Duran; Karen J Hershkop; Sonia Caprio
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Hepatic insulin clearance is the primary determinant of insulin sensitivity in the normal dog.

Authors:  Marilyn Ader; Darko Stefanovski; Stella P Kim; Joyce M Richey; Viorica Ionut; Karyn J Catalano; Katrin Hucking; Martin Ellmerer; Gregg Van Citters; Isabel R Hsu; Jenny D Chiu; Orison O Woolcott; Lisa N Harrison; Dan Zheng; Maya Lottati; Cathryn M Kolka; Vahe Mooradian; Justin Dittmann; Sophia Yae; Huiwen Liu; Ana Valeria B Castro; Morvarid Kabir; Richard N Bergman
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 5.002

6.  Single-centre, triple-blinded, randomised, 1-year, parallel-group, superiority study to compare the effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on remission of type 2 diabetes and β-cell function in subjects with morbid obesity: a protocol for the Obesity surgery in Tønsberg (Oseberg) study.

Authors:  Heidi Borgeraas; Jøran Hjelmesæth; Kåre Inge Birkeland; Farhat Fatima; John Olav Grimnes; Hanne L Gulseth; Erling Halvorsen; Jens Kristoffer Hertel; Tor Olav Widerøe Hillestad; Line Kristin Johnson; Tor-Ivar Karlsen; Ronette L Kolotkin; Nils Petter Kvan; Morten Lindberg; Jolanta Lorentzen; Njord Nordstrand; Rune Sandbu; Kathrine Aagelen Seeberg; Birgitte Seip; Marius Svanevik; Tone Gretland Valderhaug; Dag Hofsø
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.