Literature DB >> 9754614

Applying human factors to the design of medical equipment: patient-controlled analgesia.

L Lin1, R Isla, K Doniz, H Harkness, K J Vicente, D J Doyle.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Medical instruments commonly have poorly designed user interfaces that promote human errors with life-threatening consequences. The primary hypothesis of this study was that a specific user interface could be made safer and more efficient if redesigned using human factors techniques and principles.
METHODS: The user interface of a commercially available patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pump, the Abbott Lifecare 4100 PCA Plus II infuser, was evaluated using a cognitive task analysis of bench tests and field observations. Based on this analysis, the user interface was redesigned. Important elements of the new design include a dialog structure with fewer steps, a dialog overview showing the user's location in the programming sequence, better command feedback, easier error recovery, and clearer labels and messages. The changes were evaluated by comparing a computer prototype of the new interface with a computer simulation of the old one. Twelve student nurses performed six programming tasks with each interface. Task completion time, number of errors, and subjective mental workload were collected for each trial.
RESULTS: The results showed significantly faster programming times (F(1,11) = 6.85, P < 0.025), lower mental workload ratings (chi2(1) = 4.45, p < 0.025, one-tailed), and fewer errors (chi2(1) = 3.33, p < 0.05, one-tailed) with the new interface.
CONCLUSION: Adopting a human factors approach to redesigning the PCA interface led to significantly faster, easier, and more reliable performance. These findings have important implications for improving the design of other computer-based medical equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9754614     DOI: 10.1023/a:1009928203196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  8 in total

1.  Evaluating the human engineering of microprocessor-controlled operating room devices.

Authors:  R I Cook; S S Potter; D D Woods; J S McDonald
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1991-07

Review 2.  Patient-controlled analgesia: a review.

Authors:  M Smythe
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.705

3.  Error in medicine.

Authors:  L L Leape
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-12-21       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Mishaps with patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Preventing errors associated with P.C.A. pumps.

Authors:  M R Cohen
Journal:  Nursing       Date:  1993-04

6.  A system for standardized evaluation of patient-controlled analgesia devices: design, construction, and engineering aspects.

Authors:  A H Isley; H Owen; J L Plummer; N A Mackey; D R Roberts
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-05

7.  Patient and nurse evaluation of patient-controlled analgesia delivery systems for postoperative pain management.

Authors:  Y Sawaki; R K Parker; P F White
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Patient-controlled analgesia. Experience of two new machines.

Authors:  H Owen; R J Glavin; R M Reekie; A S Trew
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 6.955

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  Patient-controlled analgesia.

Authors:  D J Doyle; K J Vicente
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  The cognitive complexity of a provider order entry interface.

Authors:  Jan Horsky; David R Kaufman; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

3.  Arguing for the need of triangulation and iteration when designing medical equipment.

Authors:  Karin Garmer; Erik Liljegren; Anna-Lisa Osvalder; Sven Dahlman
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Medication errors in critical care: risk factors, prevention and disclosure.

Authors:  Eric Camiré; Eric Moyen; Henry Thomas Stelfox
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Comprehensive analysis of a medication dosing error related to CPOE.

Authors:  Jan Horsky; Gilad J Kuperman; Vimla L Patel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-03-31       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Five-year experience of critical incidents associated with patient-controlled analgesia in an Irish University Hospital.

Authors:  I Ahmad; A Thompson; M Frawley; P Hu; A Heffernan; C Power
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 7.  A systematic review of human factors and ergonomics (HFE)-based healthcare system redesign for quality of care and patient safety.

Authors:  Anping Xie; Pascale Carayon
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 8.  A systematic review of the designs of clinical technology: findings and recommendations for future research.

Authors:  Greg Alexander; Nancy Staggers
Journal:  ANS Adv Nurs Sci       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.824

Review 9.  Patient-controlled analgesia-related medication errors in the postoperative period: causes and prevention.

Authors:  Jeff R Schein; Rodney W Hicks; Winnie W Nelson; Vanja Sikirica; D John Doyle
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  Patient safety in surgery: error detection and prevention.

Authors:  Edward Etchells; Catherine O'Neill; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-06-10       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.