K M Means1, D E Rodell, P S O'Sullivan, R M Winger. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA. kmmeans@Life.UAMS.EDU
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Older adults commonly experience falls because of balance and mobility problems. Better assessment methods are needed to understand and correct balance and mobility disorders. METHODS: We used a low technology, functional obstacle course (FOC) to measure balance and mobility in 352 community-dwelling elderly participants. To establish concurrent validity of the FOC, we compared performance on the FOC with two established measures of balance and mobility: performance on the Tinetti Index (TI) and postural sway area measured on a force platform. RESULTS: Bivariate correlation analyses revealed significant inverse correlations between FOC completion time, the TI balance and gait subscores, and the TI total score (r = -.73 to -.78). The FOC quality scores and TI balance and subscores gait and TI total scores (r = .76 to .82) were significantly positively correlated. FOC time had significant, but small, positive correlations with sway area with eyes open (r = .18) and closed (r = .17) and nonsignificant correlation with sway area with visual feedback. FOC quality also had significant, but smaller, inverse correlations with sway area with eyes open (r = -.024) and closed (r = -.015), and nonsignificant correlation with sway area with visual feedback. Regression analysis showed that TI gait and balance measures accounted for most of the variance found in FOC performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the position that the FOC and the TI measure dynamic balance, whereas postural sway measures a different aspect of balance. Advantages of the FOC include the evaluation of environmentally influenced falls and balance problems.
BACKGROUND: Older adults commonly experience falls because of balance and mobility problems. Better assessment methods are needed to understand and correct balance and mobility disorders. METHODS: We used a low technology, functional obstacle course (FOC) to measure balance and mobility in 352 community-dwelling elderly participants. To establish concurrent validity of the FOC, we compared performance on the FOC with two established measures of balance and mobility: performance on the Tinetti Index (TI) and postural sway area measured on a force platform. RESULTS: Bivariate correlation analyses revealed significant inverse correlations between FOC completion time, the TI balance and gait subscores, and the TI total score (r = -.73 to -.78). The FOC quality scores and TI balance and subscores gait and TI total scores (r = .76 to .82) were significantly positively correlated. FOC time had significant, but small, positive correlations with sway area with eyes open (r = .18) and closed (r = .17) and nonsignificant correlation with sway area with visual feedback. FOC quality also had significant, but smaller, inverse correlations with sway area with eyes open (r = -.024) and closed (r = -.015), and nonsignificant correlation with sway area with visual feedback. Regression analysis showed that TI gait and balance measures accounted for most of the variance found in FOC performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the position that the FOC and the TI measure dynamic balance, whereas postural sway measures a different aspect of balance. Advantages of the FOC include the evaluation of environmentally influenced falls and balance problems.